Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30093716›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks using HybridRank algorithm.

Sara Ahajjam, Hassan Badir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Social Contact Patterns Associated With Tuberculosis: A Case-control Study in Southwest Iran.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara AhajjamLaboratory of Information and communication technologies, National School of Applied Sciences, ENSAT, Tangier, Morocco. ahajjamsara@gmail.com.
Hassan BadirLaboratory of Information and communication technologies, National School of Applied Sciences, ENSAT, Tangier, Morocco.
École Nationale de Commerce et de Gestion de Tanger · MA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the influential spreaders in complex networks is crucial to understand who is responsible for the spreading processes and the influence maximization through networks. Targeting these influential spreaders is significant for designing strategies for accelerating the propagation of information that is useful for various applications, such as viral marketing applications or blocking the diffusion of annoying information (spreading of viruses, rumors, online negative behaviors, and cyberbullying). Existing methods such as local centrality measures like degree centrality are less effective, and global measures like closeness and betweenness centrality could better identify influential spreaders but they have some limitations. In this paper, we propose the HybridRank algorithm using a new hybrid centrality measure for detecting a set of influential spreaders using the topological features of the network. We use the SIR spreading model for simulating the spreading processes in networks to evaluate the performance of our algorithm. Empirical experiments are conducted on real and artificial networks, and the results show that the spreaders identified by our approach are more influential than several benchmarks.

Identifiers

PMID30093716
PMCPMC6085314
OpenAlexW2887447177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.