Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30093702›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Silkworms suppress the release of green leaf volatiles by mulberry leaves with an enzyme from their spinnerets.

Hiroki Takai, Rika Ozawa, Junji Takabayashi, Saki Fujii, Kiriko Arai, Ryoko T Ichiki, Takao Koeduka, Hideo Dohra, Toshiyuki Ohnishi, Sakura Taketazu and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Silkworm and spider silk electrospinning: a review.Environmental chemistry letters · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroki TakaiDivision of Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, 753-8515, Japan.
Rika OzawaCenter for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2113, Japan.
Junji TakabayashiCenter for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2113, Japan.
Saki FujiiDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, 753-8515, Japan.
Kiriko AraiDivision of Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, 753-8515, Japan.
Ryoko T IchikiJapan International Research Centre for Agricultural Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0851, Japan.
Takao KoedukaDivision of Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, 753-8515, Japan.
Hideo DohraResearch Institute of Green Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, 422-8529, Japan.
Toshiyuki OhnishiResearch Institute of Green Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, 422-8529, Japan.
Sakura TaketazuDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, 753-8515, Japan.
Jun KobayashiDivision of Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, 753-8515, Japan.
Yooichi KainohFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan.
Satoshi NakamuraJapan International Research Centre for Agricultural Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0851, Japan.
Takeshi FujiiLaboratory of Applied Entomology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Yukio IshikawaLaboratory of Applied Entomology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Takashi KiuchiLaboratory of Insect Genetics and Bioscience, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Susumu KatsumaLaboratory of Insect Genetics and Bioscience, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Masayoshi UefuneDepartment of Agrobiological Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Meijo University, Nagoya, Aichi, 468-8502, Japan.
Toru ShimadaLaboratory of Insect Genetics and Bioscience, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5791-0000
Kenji MatsuiDivision of Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, 753-8515, Japan. matsui@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4875-5176
Yamaguchi University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPJapan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences · JPKyoto University · JPShizuoka University · JPMeijo University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to herbivory, plants emit a blend of volatile organic compounds that includes green leaf volatiles (GLVs) and terpenoids. These volatiles are known to attract natural enemies of herbivores and are therefore considered to function as an indirect defense. Selection should favor herbivores that are able to suppress these volatile emissions, and thereby make themselves less conspicuous to natural enemies. We tested this possibility for silkworms, which were observed to leave secretions from their spinnerets while feeding on mulberry leaves. When we ablated the spinnerets of silkworms, no secretions were observed. Leaves infested by intact silkworms released smaller amounts of GLVs than leaves infested by ablated silkworms, indicating that the spinneret secretion suppressed GLV production. This difference in GLV emissions was also reflected in the behavioral response of Zenillia dolosa (Tachinidae), a parasitoid fly of silkworms. The flies laid fewer eggs when exposed to the volatiles from intact silkworm-infested leaves than when exposed to the volatiles from ablated silkworm-infested leaves. We identified a novel enzyme in the secretion from the spinneret that is responsible for the GLV suppression. The enzyme converted 13(S)-hydroperoxy-(9Z,11E,15Z)-octadecatrienoic acid, an intermediate in the biosynthetic pathway of GLVs, into its keto-derivative in a stereospecific manner. Taken together, this study shows that silkworms are able to feed on mulberry in a stealthy manner by suppressing GLV production with an enzyme in secretions of their spinnerets, which might be a countermeasure against induced indirect defense by mulberry plants.

Indexed as

AnimalsBombyxDisease ResistanceHerbivoryMorusPhylogenyPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesTerpenesVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatilizationTerpenesVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID30093702
PMCPMC6085349
OpenAlexW2885732248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.