Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30093677›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Bifidobacterium adolescentis is intrinsically resistant to antitubercular drugs.

Dhanashree Lokesh, Raman Parkesh, Rajagopal Kammara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Microbiome Single Cell Atlases Generated with a Commercial Instrument.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review and Perspectives onMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  15. A survey on antimicrobial resistance genes of frequently used probiotic bacteria, 1901 to 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Role of Gut and Lung Microbiota in Susceptibility to Tuberculosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  19. Mobile Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Probiotics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dhanashree LokeshSenior Research Fellow, Department of Protein Chemistry and Technology, CSIR-CFTRI, Mysore, 20, India.
Raman ParkeshPrincipal Scientist, Protein Science Center, Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector-39A, Chandigarh, India.
Rajagopal KammaraSenior Research Fellow, Department of Protein Chemistry and Technology, CSIR-CFTRI, Mysore, 20, India. krgopal22@rediffmail.com.
Central Food Technological Research Institute · INInstitute of Microbial Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple mutations in the β subunit of the RNA polymerase (rpoβ) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) are the primary cause of resistance to rifamycin (RIF). In the present study, bifidobacterial rpoβ sequences were analyzed to characterize the mutations that contribute to the development of intrinsic resistance to RIF, isoniazid, streptomycin and pyrazinamide. Sequence variations, which mapped to cassettes 1 and 2 of the rpoβ pocket, are also found in multidrug-resistant Mtb (MDR Mtb). Growth curves in the presence of osmolytes and different concentrations of RIF showed that the bacteria adapted rapidly by shortening the growth curve lag time. Insight into the adapted rpoβ DNA sequences revealed that B. adolescentis harbored mutations both in the RIF pocket and in regions outside the pocket. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and mutant prevention concentrations (MPCs) indicated that B. longum, B. adolescentis and B. animalis are resistant to antitubercular drugs. 3D-homology modeling and binding interaction studies using computational docking suggested that mutants had reduced binding affinity towards RIF. RIF-exposed/resistant bacteria exhibited variant protein profiles along with morphological differences, such as elongated and branched cells, surface conversion from rough to smooth, and formation of a concentrating ring.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsBifidobacterium adolescentisBinding SitesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialIsoniazidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Docking SimulationMutationProtein BindingProtein DomainsPyrazinamideRifamycinsRNA Polymerase IIAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsIsoniazidPyrazinamideRifamycinsRNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID30093677
PMCPMC6085307
OpenAlexW2885912392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.