Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30093674›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Monetary Incentives Modulate Feedback-related Brain Activity.

Shuting Mei, Qi Li, Xun Liu, Ya Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Avoiding monetary loss: A human habenula functional MRI ultra-high field study.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021
    Article
  7. Functional heterogeneity of perceived control in feedback processing.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Aberrant reward dynamics in trait anticipatory anhedonia.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Contextual valence modulates the effect of choice on incentive processing.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuting MeiDepartment of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Qi LiCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China.
Xun LiuCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China.
Ya ZhengDepartment of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China. zhengya@dmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-7469-5955

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31271194National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31500872National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31571161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown that feedback evaluation is sensitive to monetary incentive. We investigated whether this sensitivity is driven by motivational salience (the difference between both rewarding and punishing events versus neutral events) or by motivational valence (the difference between rewarding and punishing events). Fifty-seven participants performed a monetary incentive delay task under a gain context, a loss context, and a neutral context with their electroencephalogram recorded. During the time domain, the feedback-related negativity (FRN) showed a motivational salience effect whereas the P3 displayed a reward valence effect. During the time-frequency domain, we observed a motivational salience effect for phase-locked theta power regardless of performance feedback, but a reward valence effect for non-phase-locked theta power in response to unsuccessful feedback. Moreover, we found a reward valence effect for phase-locked delta. These findings thus suggest that the affective modulation on feedback evaluation can be driven either by motivational valence or by motivational salience, which depends on the temporal dynamics (the FRN vs. the P3), the frequency dynamics (theta vs. delta power), as well as the phase dynamics (evoked vs. induced power).

Indexed as

CuesMotivationRewardAdolescentBrainElectroencephalographyFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleHumansMaleNervous System Physiological PhenomenaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30093674
PMCPMC6085338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.