ArticleScientific reports2018
Behavioural patterns of electrolyte repletion in intensive care units: lessons from a large electronic dataset.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying the Serum Magnesium Response and Predictors of Response Following Intravenous Magnesium Replacement in Critically Ill Patients.Pharmacotherapy · 2026Article
- Supplementation of calcium, magnesium, phosphate, and potassium in critically ill patients: A multicenter cohort study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Potassium Repletion Thresholds during Critical Illness.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Article
- Risk factors for new-onset atrial fibrillation during critical illness: A Delphi study.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2022Article
- Guiding Efficient, Effective, and Patient-Oriented Electrolyte Replacement in Critical Care: An Artificial Intelligence Reinforcement Learning Approach.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- The Impact of Delayed Symptomatic Treatment Implementation in the Intensive Care Unit.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Examination of Electrolyte Replacements in the ICU Utilizing MIMIC-III Dataset Demonstrates Redundant Replacement Patterns.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Repletion of electrolytes often depends on provider-specific behavior and hospital policy. We examined the pattern of electrolyte repletion across several intensive care units (ICU) in a large healthcare system from 2010-2015. This included 109 723 potassium repletions, 51 833 magnesium repletions, 2 306 calcium repletions, 8 770 phosphate repletions, and 3 128 249 visit-days over 332 018 visits. Potassium, magnesium, and calcium were usually repleted within the institutional reference range. In contrast, the bulk of phosphate repletion was done with pre-repletion serum level below the reference range. The impact of repletion on post-repletion levels was significant but uniformly small. The pre-repletion serum level had a significant inverse correlation with the post-repletion level of each electrolyte. Potassium, magnesium and phosphate follow-up labs were scheduled in 9-10 hours after their repletion. In contrast, calcium was rechecked in less than 20 minutes. Routine repletion of potassium, magnesium and calcium had no effect on the incidence of tachyarrhythmias. We estimated the expense from electrolyte repletion within the reference range was approximately $1.25 million. Absent a specific clinical indication, repleting electrolytes when the serum concentration are within normative values may represent an avenue for cost savings, staff burden unload and potential reduction in frequency of complications in the ICUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.