ArticleScientific reports2018
Gauss's law for networks directly reveals community boundaries.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Community Detection on Networks with Ricci Flow.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of network topology provides insight into the function and behavior of physical, social, and biological systems. A natural step towards discovering the organizing principles of these complex topologies is to identify a reduced network representation using cohesive subgroups or communities. This procedure often uncovers the underlying mechanisms governing the functional assembly of complex networks. A community is usually defined as a subgraph or a set of nodes that has more edges than would be expected from a simple, null distribution of edges over the graph. This view drives objective such as modularity. Another perspective, corresponding to objectives like conductance or density, is that communities are groups of nodes that have extremal properties with respect to the number of internal edges and cut edges. Here we show that identifying community boundaries rather than communities results in a more accurate decomposition of the network into informative components. We derive a network analog of Gauss's law that relates a measure of flux through a subgraph's boundary to the connectivity among the subgraph's nodes. Our Gauss's law for networks naturally characterizes a community as a subgraph with high flux through its boundary. Aggregating flux over these boundaries gives rise to a Laplacian and forms the basis of our "Laplacian modularity" quality function for community detection that is applicable to general network types. This technique allows us to determine communities that are both overlapping and hierarchically organized.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.