Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30093510›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study.

James W F Catto, Pramit Khetrapal, Gareth Ambler, Rachael Sarpong, Muhammad Shamim Khan, Melanie Tan, Andrew Feber, Simon Dixon, Louise Goodwin, Norman R Williams and 5 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03049410 (A Phase III Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Robotically Assisted Radical Cystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03049410 nacompletednot on this map

A Phase III Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Robotically Assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC) and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion With Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC) in Patients With Bladder Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2017 to 2021Enrolled339ConditionsBladder CancerArmsIntracorporeal Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy, Open Radical Cystectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Health-related quality of life overview after different curative treatment options in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an umbrella review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Robotic surgery: getting the evidence right.The Medical journal of Australia · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

James W F CattoAcademic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Pramit KhetrapalDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Gareth AmblerDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.
Rachael SarpongSurgical and Interventional Trials Unit (SITU), Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Muhammad Shamim KhanDepartment of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Melanie TanSurgical and Interventional Trials Unit (SITU), Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew FeberDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Simon DixonHealth Economics and Decision Science, NIHR Research Design Service Yorkshire and the Humber, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Louise GoodwinAcademic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Norman R WilliamsSurgical and Interventional Trials Unit (SITU), Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
John McGrathDepartment of Urology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
Edward RoweDepartment of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Anthony KoupparisDepartment of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Chris Brew-GravesSurgical and Interventional Trials Unit (SITU), Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
John D KellyDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBSociety of Interventional Radiology · USNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBDecision Sciences (United States) · USRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt. Thomas Hospital · CAUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBladder cancer (BC) is a common malignancy and one of the most expensive to manage. Radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymphadenectomy is a gold standard treatment for high-risk BC. Reductions in morbidity and mortality from RC may be achieved through robot-assisted RC (RARC). Prospective comparisons between open RC (ORC) and RARC have been limited by sample size, use of extracorporeal reconstruction and use of outcomes important for ORC. Conversely, while RARC is gaining in popularity, there is little evidence to suggest it is superior to ORC. We are undertaking a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare RARC with intracorporeal reconstruction (iRARC) and ORC using multimodal outcomes to explore qualitative and quantitative recovery after surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: iROC is a multicentre prospective RCT in English National Health Service (NHS) cancer centres. We will randomise 320 patients undergoing RC to either iRARC or ORC. Treatment allocation will occur after trial entry and consent. The primary outcome is days alive and out of hospital within the first 90 days from surgery. Secondary outcomes will measure functional recovery (activity trackers, chair-to-stand tests and health related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires), morbidity (complications and readmissions), cost-effectiveness (using EuroQol-5 Domain-5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) and unit costs) and surgeon fatigue. Patients will be analysed according to intention to treat. The primary outcome will be transformed and analysed using regression. All statistical assumptions will be investigated. Secondary outcomes will be analysed using appropriate regression methods. An internal feasibility study of the first 30 patients will evaluate recruitment rates, acceptance of randomised treatment choice, compliance outcome collection and to revise our sample size. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has ethical approval (REC reference 16/NE/0418). Findings will be made available to patients, clinicians, funders and the NHS through peer-reviewed publications, social media and patient support groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN13680280 and NCT03049410.

Indexed as

AdultClinical ProtocolsCystectomyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRobotic Surgical ProceduresUrinary Bladder Neoplasmsbladder cancercomplicationscost-effectivenesslength of stayopen surgeryradical cystectomyrecoveryrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID30093510
PMCPMC6089318
OpenAlexW2892019215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.