ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2018
Non-invasive Characterization of Focal Arrhythmia with Electromechanical Wave Imaging in Vivo.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noninvasive localization of cardiac arrhythmias using electromechanical wave imaging.Science translational medicine · 2020Article
- Localization of Accessory Pathways in Pediatric Patients With Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome Using 3D-Rendered Electromechanical Wave Imaging.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2019Article
- Reproducibility and Angle Independence of Electromechanical Wave Imaging for the Measurement of Electromechanical Activation during Sinus Rhythm in Healthy Humans.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There is currently no established method for the non-invasive characterization of arrhythmia and differentiation between endocardial and epicardial triggers at the point of care. Electromechanical wave imaging (EWI) is a novel ultrasound-based imaging technique based on time-domain transient strain estimation that can map and characterize electromechanical activation in the heart in vivo. The objectives of this initial feasibility study were to determine that EWI is capable of differentiating between endocardial and epicardial sources of focal rhythm and, as a proof-of-concept, that EWI could characterize focal arrhythmia in one patient with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) before radiofrequency (RF) ablation treatment. First, validation of EWI for differentiation of surface of origin was performed in seven (n = 7) adult dogs using four epicardial and four endocardial pacing protocols. Second, one (n = 1) adult patient diagnosed with PVC was imaged with EWI before the scheduled RF ablation procedure, and EWI results were compared with mapping procedure results. In dogs, EWI was capable of detecting whether pacing was of endocardial or epicardial origin in six of seven cases (86% success rate). In the PVC patient, EWI correctly identified both regions and surface of origin, as confirmed by results from the electrical mapping obtained from the RF ablation procedure. These results reveal that EWI can map the electromechanical activation across the myocardium and indicate that EWI could serve as a valuable pre-treatment planning tool in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.