Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30092971›Full record

ReviewJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2018

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in the Oncology Patient.

Jennifer H Jordan, Ryan M Todd, Sujethra Vasu, W Gregory Hundley

Abstract readReviewVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Review in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria on Cardiac Toxicity Prevention and Management After Thoracic Radiotherapy.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Myocardial strain: a clinical review.Irish journal of medical science · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer H JordanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Cardiovascular Medicine at the Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Electronic address: jennifer.jordan@wakehealth.edu.
Ryan M ToddDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Cardiovascular Medicine at the Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Sujethra VasuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Cardiovascular Medicine at the Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
W Gregory HundleyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Cardiovascular Medicine at the Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Funding

Wake Forest NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189824 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Emily Van Meter Dressler, GLENN J LESSER · 2014 to 2026
$57.9M
Preventing Anthracycline Cardiovascular Toxicity with StatinsR01HL118740 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUNDLEY, WILLIAM GREGORY · 2013 to 2018
$4.2M
Understanding and Predicting Fatigue, CV Decline & Events After Breast CA TreatmentR01CA199167 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUNDLEY, WILLIAM GREGORY · 2015 to 2022
$3.2M
Early Imaging Detection of CV Injury after CancerR01CA167821 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUNDLEY, WILLIAM GREGORY, JOLLY, MARIE-PIERRE · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA167821NCI NIH HHS R01 CA199167NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189824NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL118740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with or receiving potentially cardiotoxic treatment for cancer are susceptible to developing decrements in left ventricular mass, diastolic function, or systolic function. They may also experience valvular heart disease, pericardial disease, or intracardiac masses. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance may be used to assess cardiac anatomy, structure, and function and to characterize myocardial tissue. This combination of features facilitates the diagnosis and management of disease processes in patients with or those who have survived cancer. This report outlines and describes prior research involving cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing cardiovascular disease in patients with or previously having received treatment for cancer.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAntineoplastic AgentsCancer SurvivorsCardiotoxicityHeartHeart DiseasesHumansNeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapyRisk FactorsAntineoplastic Agentscardio-oncologycardiovascular magnetic resonancetissue characterization

Identifiers

PMID30092971
PMCPMC6242266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.