Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30092917›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2018

Functional Neuroimaging Evidence for Distinct Neurobiological Pathways in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Michael C Stevens, Godfrey D Pearlson, Vince D Calhoun, Katie L Bessette

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Characterizing neuroanatomic heterogeneity in people with and without ADHD based on subcortical brain volumes.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael C StevensOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, the Institute of Living, Hartford, Connecticut; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: Michael.Stevens@hhchealth.org.
Godfrey D PearlsonOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, the Institute of Living, Hartford, Connecticut; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Vince D CalhounDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Mind Research Network, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Katie L BessetteOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, the Institute of Living, Hartford, Connecticut; Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Yale University · USMind Research Network · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Characterizing Two Distinct ADHD Neurobiologies with fMRIR01MH080956 · NIMH · HARTFORD HOSPITAL · PI STEVENS, MICHAEL C · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA challenge facing clinical neuroscientists is how best to synthesize diverse and sometimes inconsistent evidence for neuropsychological deficits and brain system dysfunction found in psychiatric disorders into models that guide etiological and treatment research. Multiple-pathway models suggest that psychiatric symptoms might arise from pathophysiology in different neural systems. This study tested dual-pathway model predictions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) that reward and executive function cognitive deficits should be related to abnormalities in corresponding functionally specialized neural systems.

methodsBehavioral inhibition and preference for immediate rewards were assessed in N = 251 adolescent boys and girls ages 12 to 18 diagnosed with DSM-IV combined-subtype ADHD or non-ADHD control subjects. Following taxometric analyses of test performance, the resulting subgroups were compared on a functional magnetic resonance imaging monetary incentive delay task probing reward anticipation and go/no-go task of motor response inhibition.

resultsThree ADHD subgroups were identified consistent with different proposed pathways-ADHD with executive function/motor inhibition deficits, ADHD with both executive and reward deficits, and ADHD with relatively normal test performance. Each cognitive domain mapped to different ADHD brain dysfunction features as expected. However, no brain abnormalities were found common to all ADHD subgroups despite the fact they had nearly identical ADHD-related clinical characteristics.

conclusionsThe results suggest that combined-subtype ADHD is a collection of discrete disorders for which a comparable behavioral end point arises through different neurobiological pathways. The findings raise caution about applying common cause, single-deficit conceptual models to individual ADHD patients and should prompt researchers to consider biologically defined, multifactorial etiological models for other psychiatric diagnoses.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalRewardAdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildCognitive DysfunctionExecutive FunctionFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePsychomotor PerformanceADHDfMRIInhibitionPathwayRewardSubgroup

Identifiers

PMID30092917
PMCPMC6089229
OpenAlexW2759950148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.