Trial reportStem cell research & therapy2018
Cell therapy induced regeneration of severely atrophied mandibular bone in a clinical trial.
Trial report in Stem cell research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 110 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Jaw Bone Reconstruction Using a Combination of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Biomaterial Prior to Dental Implant Placement
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy of a Combination of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Biomaterial in Jaw Bone Regeneration Prior to Dental Implant Placement in Comparison to Standard Autologous Bone Grafting
Who cites it
110 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Use of cells and/or biologics combined with scaffolds in alveolar bone augmentation for implant site development.Journal of periodontology · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical stem cell therapy in oral and craniofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- Bone Regeneration with Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Scaffolds: Systematic Review of Human Clinical Trials.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of stem cells in bone rehabilitation in patients with alveolar bone atrophy: a systematic review.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2023Pooled it
- Implant-supported removable partial dentures compared to conventional dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life, patient satisfaction, and biomechanical complications.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2022Pooled it
- Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Treatment in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury, Multiple Sclerosis and Ischemic Stroke - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Bone Regeneration in Oral Implantology. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Intrathecal Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial (SMART-MS).Neurology · 2026Trial
- Bone Augmentation of Atrophic Alveolar Ridges Using a Synthetic Bone Substitute With Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Trial
- Emerging, personalized, and minimally invasive technologies for periodontal and peri-implant soft and hard tissue regenerative therapy.Journal of periodontology · 2026Review
- New technologies in oral reconstructive medicine: Consensus report of the AAP/OF/SEPA Workshop.Journal of periodontology · 2026Article
- Distinct Immunomodulatory Strategies Guide Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cell-Mediated Bone Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapeutic strategies for female infertility: current evidence and emerging targeting approaches.Biotechnology letters · 2026Review
- Characterization ofJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells do not promote oral cancer cell growth in vitro and metastasis in vivo.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Directly Thawed Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Retain Mechanism of Action and Support Bone Clinical Translation.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
- Can Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Bone Regeneration in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- Synthetic Biomaterials for Alveolar Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review of Clinical Applications and Regenerative Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical Progress in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy: A Focus on Rheumatic Diseases.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025Review
50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutologous grafting, despite some disadvantages, is still considered the gold standard for reconstruction of maxillofacial bone defects. The aim of this study was to evaluate bone regeneration using bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in a clinical trial, a less invasive approach than autologous bone grafting. This comprehensive clinical trial included subjects with severe mandibular ridge resorption.
methodsThe study included 11 subjects aged 52-79 years with severe mandibular ridge resorption. Bone marrow cells were aspirated from the posterior iliac crest and plastic adherent cells were expanded in culture medium containing human platelet lysate. The MSCs and biphasic calcium phosphate granules as scaffolds were inserted subperiosteally onto the resorbed alveolar ridge. After 4-6 months of healing, new bone formation was assessed clinically and radiographically, as were safety and feasibility. Bone at the implant site was biopsied for micro-computed topography and histological analyses and dental implants were placed in the newly regenerated bone. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction were assessed after 12 months.
resultsThe bone marrow cells, expanded in vitro and inserted into the defect together with biphasic calcium phosphate granules, induced significant new bone formation. The regenerated bone volume was adequate for dental implant installation. Healing was uneventful, without adverse events. The patients were satisfied with the esthetic and functional outcomes. No side effects were observed.
conclusionsThe results of this comprehensive clinical trial in human subjects confirm that MSCs can successfully induce significant formation of new bone, with no untoward sequelae. Hence, this novel augmentation procedure warrants further investigation and may form the basis of a valid treatment protocol, challenging the current gold standard.
trial registrationEudraCT, 2012-003139-50. Registered on 21 August 2013. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 02751125 . Registered on 26 April 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.