Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30092817›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2018

Volumetric breast density and risk of advanced cancers after a negative screening episode: a cohort study.

Donella Puliti, Marco Zappa, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Elena Pierpaoli, Gianfranco Manneschi, Daniela Ambrogetti, Leonardo Ventura, Paola Mantellini, DENSITY Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Donella PulitiClinical Epidemiology Unit, ISPRO - Oncological network, prevention and research institute, Via delle Oblate 4, 50141, Florence, Italy. d.puliti@ispo.toscana.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3820-4442
Marco ZappaClinical Epidemiology Unit, ISPRO - Oncological network, prevention and research institute, Via delle Oblate 4, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Paolo Giorgi RossiInterinstitutional Epidemiology Unit, 42122 AUSL Reggio Emilia, Italy and Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Elena PierpaoliScreening Unit, ISPRO - Oncological network, prevention and research institute, Florence, Italy.
Gianfranco ManneschiClinical Epidemiology Unit, ISPRO - Oncological network, prevention and research institute, Via delle Oblate 4, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Daniela AmbrogettiScreening Unit, ISPRO - Oncological network, prevention and research institute, Florence, Italy.
Leonardo VenturaClinical Epidemiology Unit, ISPRO - Oncological network, prevention and research institute, Via delle Oblate 4, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Paola MantelliniScreening Unit, ISPRO - Oncological network, prevention and research institute, Florence, Italy.
DENSITY Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated the association between volumetric breast density (BD) and risk of advanced cancers after a negative screening episode.

methodsA cohort of 16,752 women aged 49-54 years at their first screening mammography in the Florence screening programme was followed for breast cancer (BC) incidence until the second screening round. Volumetric BD was measured using fully automated software. The cumulative incidence of advanced cancer after a negative screening episode (including stage II or more severe cancer during the screening interval - on average 28 months - and at the subsequent round) was calculated separately for Volpara density grade (VDG) categories.

resultsBC incidence gradually increased with the increas in BD: 3.7‰, 5.1‰, 5.4‰ and 9.1‰ in the VDG categories 1-4, respectively (p trend < 0.001). The risk of advanced cancers after a negative screening episode was 1.0‰, 1.3‰, 1.1‰, and 4.2‰ (p trend = 0.003). The highest BD category, compared with the other three together, has double the invasive BC risk (RR = 2.0; 95% CI 1.5-2.8) and almost fourfold risk of advanced cancer (RR = 3.8; 95% CI 1.8-8.0).

conclusionBD has a strong impact on the risk of advanced cancers after a negative screening episode, the best early surrogate of BC mortality. Therefore, our results suggest that screening effectiveness is quite different among BD categories.

Indexed as

Breast DensityAdultAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIncidenceItalyMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingAdvanced stageBreast cancerBreast densityMammography sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID30092817
PMCPMC6085631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.