Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30092795›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2018

Somatosensory profiles of patients with chronic myogenic temporomandibular disorders in relation to their painDETECT score.

C Welte-Jzyk, D B Pfau, A Hartmann, M Daubländer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C Welte-JzykDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany. claudia.welte-jzyk@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7653-6288
D B PfauMannheim Institute of Public Health (MIPH), Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
A HartmannPrivate Practice Dr. Seiler and colleagues, Filderstadt, Germany.
M DaubländerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to characterize patients with chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in terms of existing hyperalgesia against cold, heat and pressure.

methodsThe extent of hyperalgesia for pressure and thermal sensation in TMD patients was determined by the use of the painDETECT questionnaire ("Is cold or heat in this area occasionally painful?" "Does slight pressure in this area, e.g., with a finger, trigger pain?") and experimental somatosensory testing against thermal and pressure stimuli (Quantitative Sensory Testing; QST). In addition, we explored psychological comorbidity among the chronic TMD patients (hospital anxiety and depression scale, HADS-D and coping strategies questionnaire, CSQ).

resultsNineteen patients with chronic TMD and 38 healthy subjects participated in the study. N = 12 patients had a painDETECT score ≤ 12, n = 3 patients had a painDETECT score of 13-18 and n = 4 patients had a painDETECT score ≥ 19. TMD patients with painDETECT scores ≥19 had moderately, strong or very strong enhancement of thermal and pressure pain perception, whereas patients with painDETECT scores 13-18 and ≤ 12 responded these questions with "never", "hardly noticed" or "slightly painful" (p < 0.05-0.01). With increasing painDETECT scores we found increased hyperalgesia for pressure (p < 0.01) and thermal stimuli (p < 0.05) in QST. The patients with a painDETECT score ≥ 19 showed increased signs of anxiety (p < 0.05), depression (p < 0.01), praying and hoping (p < 0.05).

conclusionThe present study has shown that the PainDETECT questionnaire can be a helpful additional diagnostic tool. Together with QST, the PainDETECT questionnaire detected hyperalgesia for pressure and thermal sensation. Therefore the PainDETECT questionnaire is helpful to decide which TMD patients should undergo QST.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseFemaleHumansHyperalgesiaMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersPainDETECT questionnaireQuantitative sensory testing (QST)Stress-induced hyperalgesiaTemporomandibular disorder (TMD)

Identifiers

PMID30092795
PMCPMC6085668
OpenAlexW2885802465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.