Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30092747›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2018

Experience: developing an inpatient malnutrition checklist for children 6 to 59 months to improve WHO protocol adherence and facilitate quality improvement in a low-resource setting.

Kathryn Beck, Angelique Mukantaganda, Scheilla Bayitondere, Richard Ndikuriyo, Almaque Dushimirimana, Vianney Bihibindi, Souzane Nyiranganji, Michel Habiyaremye, Jennifer Werdenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathryn Becka Maternal and Child Health Department , Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima , Rwinkwavu , Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0001-7407-9418
Angelique Mukantagandab Department of Pediatrics , Rwinkwavu District Hospital, Ministry of Health Rwanda , Rwinkwavu , Rwanda.
Scheilla Bayitondereb Department of Pediatrics , Rwinkwavu District Hospital, Ministry of Health Rwanda , Rwinkwavu , Rwanda.
Richard Ndikuriyob Department of Pediatrics , Rwinkwavu District Hospital, Ministry of Health Rwanda , Rwinkwavu , Rwanda.
Almaque Dushimirimanab Department of Pediatrics , Rwinkwavu District Hospital, Ministry of Health Rwanda , Rwinkwavu , Rwanda.
Vianney Bihibindia Maternal and Child Health Department , Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima , Rwinkwavu , Rwanda.
Souzane Nyiranganjib Department of Pediatrics , Rwinkwavu District Hospital, Ministry of Health Rwanda , Rwinkwavu , Rwanda.
Michel Habiyaremyeb Department of Pediatrics , Rwinkwavu District Hospital, Ministry of Health Rwanda , Rwinkwavu , Rwanda.
Jennifer Werdenberga Maternal and Child Health Department , Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima , Rwinkwavu , Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0001-9764-2488
Ministry of Health · RWBoston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In low-resource settings, inpatient case fatality for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) remains high despite evidenced-based protocols and resources to treat SAM. Key reasons include a combination of insufficiently trained staff, poor teamwork and inadequate compliance to WHO treatment guidelines which are proven to reduce mortality. Checklists have been used in surgery and obstetrics to ameliorate similarly complicated yet repetitive work processes and may be a key strategy to improving inpatient SAM protocol adherence and reducing unnecessary death. Here, we share our experience developing and piloting an inpatient malnutrition checklist (MLNC) for children 6 to 59 months and associated scoring system to coordinate care delivery, improve team documentation, strengthen WHO malnutrition protocol adherence and facilitate quality improvement in a district hospital in rural Rwanda. MLNC was developed after careful review of the 2009 Rwandan National Nutrition Protocol and 2013 WHO malnutrition guidelines. Critical steps were harmonized, extracted and designed into an initial MLNC with input from pediatric ward nurses, doctors, a locally based pediatrician and a registered dietitian. A scoring system was developed to facilitate quality improvement. Using the standard Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, MLNC was modified and progress assessed on a monthly to bimonthly basis. Significant modifications occurred in the first 6 months of piloting including incorporation of treatment reminders and formatting improvements, as well as initiation of the MLNC from the emergency department. The MLNC is the first checklist to be developed that unifies WHO 10 steps of treatment of inpatient SAM with local standards. Anecdotally, MLNC was observed to identify gaps in key malnutrition care, promote protocol adherence and facilitate quality improvement. Data gathering on the MLNC local facility impact is underway. Collaborative international efforts are needed to create an inpatient malnutrition checklist for wider use to improve quality and reduce unnecessary, facility-based child mortality.

Indexed as

ChecklistNutritional StatusPractice Guidelines as TopicChild, PreschoolDelivery of Health CareDiet TherapyFemaleHumansInfantInpatientsMaleMalnutritionPregnancyQuality ImprovementRwandaSeverity of Illness Indexchecklistslow-resource settingMalnutritionquality improvementunder-5 mortality

Identifiers

PMID30092747
PMCPMC6097458
OpenAlexW2886439479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.