Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30092719›Full record

SynthesisTrends in hearing

Auditory and Cognitive Training for Cognition in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Blake J Lawrence, Dona M P Jayakody, Helen Henshaw, Melanie A Ferguson, Robert H Eikelboom, Andrea M Loftus, Peter L Friedland

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04997577 narecruitingnot on this map

Auditory-cognitive Training Paradigm (NIH P01 Project - Speech Perception With High Cognitive Demand)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, College ParkRan2021 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsSpeech Intelligibility, AgingArmsAuditory-cognitive training paradigm, Auditory training paradigm
NCT07506408 narecruitingnot on this map

PLUS-Optimal for Adults With Listening Difficulties: Investigating the Roles of Listening and Thinking Skills in Online Training Across Different Groups

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2026 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsHearing LossArmsPractice Listening and Understand Speech (PLUS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Efficacy of a structured auditory training module in older individuals with hearing loss: a randomized controlled trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neural and Behavioral Changes in Older Adults from Auditory-Cognitive Training.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Blake J Lawrence1 Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8772-8226
Dona M P Jayakody1 Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5814-4355
Helen Henshaw3 National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, UK.
Melanie A Ferguson3 National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, UK.
Robert H Eikelboom1 Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia.
Andrea M Loftus7 School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
Peter L Friedland1 Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy of auditory training and cognitive training to improve cognitive function in adults with hearing loss. A literature search of academic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, Scopus) and gray literature (e.g., OpenGrey) identified relevant articles published up to January 25, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or repeated measures designs were included. Outcome effects were computed as Hedge's g and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42017076680). Nine studies, five auditory training, and four cognitive training met the inclusion criteria. Following auditory training, the pooled effect was small and statistically significant for both working memory ( g = 0.21; 95% CI [0.05, 0.36]) and overall cognition ( g = 0.19; 95% CI [0.07, 0.31]). Following cognitive training, the pooled effect for working memory was small and statistically significant ( g = 0.34; 95% CI [0.16, 0.53]), and the pooled effect for overall cognition was large and significant ( g = 1.03; 95% CI [0.41, 1.66]). However, this was dependent on the classification of training approach. Sensitivity analyses revealed no statistical difference between the effectiveness of auditory and cognitive training for improving cognition upon removal of a study that used a combined auditory-cognitive approach, which showed a very large effect. Overall certainty in the estimation of effect was "low" for auditory training and "very low" for cognitive training. High-quality RCTs are needed to determine which training stimuli will provide optimal conditions to improve cognition in adults with hearing loss.

Indexed as

CognitionHearingAgedCochlear ImplantsHearing AidsHearing LossHumansMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as Topichearing aidinterventionrehabilitationtransfer of learningworking memory

Identifiers

PMID30092719
PMCPMC6088475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.