Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30092403›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2018

Improved Lentiviral Gene Delivery to Mouse Liver by Hydrodynamic Vector Injection through Tail Vein.

Trine Dalsgaard, Claudia R Cecchi, Anne Louise Askou, Rasmus O Bak, Pernille O Andersen, David Hougaard, Thomas G Jensen, Frederik Dagnæs-Hansen, Jacob Giehm Mikkelsen, Thomas J Corydon and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Pathology of liver tumours in animal models].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intrabiliary infusion of naked DNA vectors targets periportal hepatocytes in mice.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2022
    Article
  14. Regulation of Transgene Expression by the Natural Sweetener Xylose.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. In vivo somatic cell base editing and prime editing.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Trine DalsgaardDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Claudia R CecchiDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Anne Louise AskouDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Rasmus O BakDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies (AIAS), Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Pernille O AndersenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
David HougaardStatens Serum Institut (SSI), DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Thomas G JensenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Frederik Dagnæs-HansenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Jacob Giehm MikkelsenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Thomas J CorydonDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Lars AagaardDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. Electronic address: aagaard@biomed.au.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delivery of genes to mouse liver is routinely accomplished by tail-vein injections of viral vectors or naked plasmid DNA. While viral vectors are typically injected in a low-pressure and -volume fashion, uptake of naked plasmid DNA to hepatocytes is facilitated by high pressure and volumes, also known as hydrodynamic delivery. In this study, we compare the efficacy and specificity of delivery of vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein (VSV-G) pseudotyped lentiviral vectors to mouse liver by a number of injection schemes. Exploiting in vivo bioluminescence imaging as a readout after lentiviral gene transfer, we compare delivery by (1) "conventional" tail-vein injections, (2) "primed" injections, (3) "hydrodynamic" injections, or (4) direct "intrahepatic" injections into exposed livers. Reporter gene activity demonstrate potent and targeted delivery to liver by hydrodynamic injections. Enhanced efficacy is confirmed by analysis of liver sections from mice treated with GFP-encoding vectors, demonstrating 10-fold higher transduction rates and gene delivery to ∼80% of hepatocytes after hydrodynamic vector delivery. In summary, lentiviral vector transfer to mouse liver can be strongly augmented by hydrodynamic tail-vein injections, resulting in both reduced off-target delivery and transduction of the majority of hepatocytes. Our findings pave the way for more effective use of lentiviral gene delivery in the mouse.

Indexed as

gene transferhepatocyteshigh-pressure tail-vein injectionhydrodynamic deliveryin vivolentivirusliver gene therapy

Identifiers

PMID30092403
PMCPMC6083003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.