ArticleTransplant immunology2018
B cell phenotypes in baboons with pig artery patch grafts receiving conventional immunosuppressive therapy.
Article in Transplant immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The potential of genetically engineered pig heart transplantation in infants with complex congenital heart disease.Pediatric transplantation · 2022Review
- T and B lymphocyte dynamics after genetically-modified pig-to-baboon kidney xenotransplantation with an anti-CD40mAb-based immunosuppressive regimen.Transplant immunology · 2022Article
- Data on B cell phenotypes in baboons with pig artery patch grafts receiving conventional immunosuppressive therapy.Data in brief · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the pig-to-baboon artery patch model with no immunosuppressive therapy, a graft from an α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO) pig elicits a significant anti-nonGal IgG response, indicating sensitization to the graft. A costimulation blockade-based regimen, e.g., anti-CD154mAb or anti-CD40mAb, prevents sensitization. However, neither of these agents is currently FDA-approved. The aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy of FDA-approved agents on the T and B cell responses.
methodsArtery patch xenotransplantation in baboons was carried out using GTKO/CD46 pigs with (n = 2) or without (n = 1) the mutant transgene for CIITA-knockdown. Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of induction with ATG and anti-CD20mAb, and maintenance with different combinations of CTLA4-Ig, tacrolimus, and rapamycin. In addition, all 3 baboons received daily corticosteroids, the IL-6R blocker, tocilizumab, at regular intervals, and the TNF-α blocker, etanercept, for the first 2 weeks. Recipient blood was monitored for anti-nonGal antibody levels by flow cytometry (using GTKO/CD46 pig aortic endothelial cells), and mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). CD22
resultsNo elicited anti-pig antibodies developed in any baboon. The frequency of naïve memory B cells increased significantly (from 34% to 90%, p = 0.0015), but there was a significant decrease in switched memory B cells (from 17% to 0.5%, p = 0.015). MLR showed no increase in the proliferative T cell response in those baboons that had received CTLA4-Ig (n = 2). Histological examination showed few or no features of rejection in any graft.
conclusionsThe data suggest that immunosuppressive therapy with only FDA-approved agents may be adequate to prevent an adaptive immune response to a genetically-engineered pig graft, particularly if CTLA4-Ig is included in the regimen, in part because the development of donor-specific memory B cells is inhibited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.