Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30092213›Full record

ReviewNeuron2018

Economic Choice as an Untangling of Options into Actions.

Seng Bum Michael Yoo, Benjamin Yost Hayden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Population geometries in frontal cortex coordinate value-based decisions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seng Bum Michael YooDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55126, USA; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14267, USA. Electronic address: sbyoo.ur.bcs@gmail.com.
Benjamin Yost HaydenDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55126, USA.

Funding

NEURONAL BASIS OF PERSISTENCER01DA038615 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HAYDEN, BENJAMIN Y · 2015 to 2024
$3.4M
Neural basis of reward-based choiceR01DA037229 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HAYDEN, BENJAMIN Y · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Repeated cocaine exposure and striatal contributions to cognitive controlR01DA038106 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HAYDEN, BENJAMIN Y · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037229NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038106NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose that economic choice can be understood as a gradual transformation from a domain of options to one of the actions. We draw an analogy with the idea of untangling information in the form vision system and propose that form vision and economic choice may be two aspects of a larger process that sculpts actions based on sensory inputs. From this viewpoint, choice results from the accumulated effect of repetitions of simple computations. These may consist primarily of relative valuations (evaluations relative to the value of rejection, perhaps in a manner akin to divisive normalization) applied to individual offers. With regard to economic choice, cortical brain regions differ primarily in their position and in what information they prioritize, and do not-with a few exceptions-have categorically distinct roles. Each region's specific contribution is determined largely by its inputs; thus, understanding connectivity is crucial for understanding choice. This view suggests that there is no single site of choice, that there is no meaningful distinction between pre- and post-decisionality, and that there is no explicit representation of value in the brain.

Indexed as

Economics, BehavioralModels, NeurologicalAnimalsBrainChoice BehaviorHumansPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual Perceptionaffordance competitioneconomic choicefunctional neuroanatomyUntanglingvalue

Identifiers

PMID30092213
PMCPMC6280664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.