SynthesisPloS one2018
Complications of bone-anchored prostheses for individuals with an extremity amputation: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes following major dysvascular lower limb amputation: an updated systematic review.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes of Bone-Anchored Versus Socket-Suspended Prostheses in Individuals With Transfemoral Amputation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Two-Arm Comparative Studies.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Analyzing research trends and developments in osseointegration in patients with extremity amputations: Systematic bibliometric analysis and research recommendations.Prosthetics and orthotics international · 2025Pooled it
- Bone-anchored prostheses for transfemoral amputation: a systematic review of outcomes, complications, patient experiences, and cost-effectiveness.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Tibial Bone-Anchored Prostheses: A Narrative Review of the Literature and Reflection on 10 Years of Surgical Practice.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Vibration assessment of transfemoral implant stability: a longitudinal case series.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Wearing Time, Quality of Life, and Complications of Lower Limb Bone-anchored Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- How To Improve Patient Selection in Individuals With Lower Extremity Amputation Using a Bone-anchored Prosthesis.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- CORR Insights®: How to Improve Patient Selection in Individuals With Lower Extremity Amputation Using a Bone-anchored Prosthesis.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Surgical technique of minor revision of a transcutaneous osseointegration prosthetic system (TOPS) with implant retention.Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2025Review
- Surgical technique of a transcutaneous osseointegration prosthesis system (TOPS) for transtibial amputees.Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2025Review
- Improving quality of life for transfemoral amputees: results from a two-year study of the OPRA implant system and rehabilitation protocol.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Harmonic Vibration Analysis in a Simplified Model for Monitoring Transfemoral Implant Loosening.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advantages of customization of osseointegrated implants in transfemoral amputees: a comparative analysis of surgical planning.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Emerging Value of Osseointegration for Intuitive Prosthetic Control after Transhumeral Amputations: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Bone-anchored prostheses for lower limb amputation in a French cohort with 1-15 years of follow-up: implant survival rates, mechanical complications, and reported outcomes.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Utility of Thermal Imaging in Predicting Superficial Infections in Transfemoral Osseointegrated Implants.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- ReliableFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Development of an evidence-based diagnostic algorithm for infection in patients with transcutaneous osseointegration following amputation.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to provide an overview of device-related complications occurring in individuals with an upper or lower extremity amputation treated with a screw, press-fit or other type of bone-anchored implant as well as interventions related to these complications.
methodA systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science databases. The included studies reported on device-related complications and interventions occurring in individuals with bone-anchored prostheses. The outcomes evaluated were death, infection, bone/device breakage, implant loosening, soft tissue complications, systemic events, antibiotic and surgical treatment. Subgroup analyses were performed for the following groups: a) implant type (screw, press-fit and other types of implants) and b) level of amputation (transfemoral, transtibial and upper extremity amputation).
resultsOf 309 studies, 12 cohort studies were eligible for inclusion, all of which had methodological shortcomings and 12 studies were excluded due to complete overlap of patient data. Implant infection were rare in certain transfemoral implants (screw: 2-11%, press-fit: 0-3%, Compress: 0%) but common in transtibial implants (29%). The same was observed for implant loosening, in transfemoral (screw: 6%, press-fit: 0-3%, Compress: 0%), transtibial implants (29%) as well as for upper extremity implants (13-23%). Intramedullary device breakage were rare in transfemoral implants (screw: 0%, press-fit: 1%, Compress: unknown) but frequent in individuals with transradial implants (27%) and absent in transtibial implants. Soft tissue infections and complications were common and underreported in most articles.
conclusionsMajor complications (e.g. implant infection, implant loosening and intramedullary device breakage) are rare in transfemoral bone-anchored prosthesis and seem to occur less frequently in individuals with press-fit implants. Minor complications, such as soft tissue infections and complications, are common but are substantially influenced by the learning curve, implant design and surgical technique. Data for patients treated with a transtibial, upper extremity or Compress implant are underreported, precluding definitive conclusions. There is a need for either an international database to report on or a standard core set of complications as well as the need to follow classification systems that result in unequivocal data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.