Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30092056›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

"We might get a lot more families who will agree": Muslim and Jewish perspectives on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy.

Celine Lewis, Zahira Latif, Melissa Hill, Megan Riddington, Monica Lakhanpaul, Owen J Arthurs, John C Hutchinson, Lyn S Chitty, Neil J Sebire

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Minimally invasive autopsy - endoscopic approach to post-mortem diagnostics.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparison of postmortem whole-body contrast-enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Celine LewisNorth East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7169-1521
Zahira LatifCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Melissa HillNorth East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Megan RiddingtonDepartment of Psychological Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Monica LakhanpaulFaculty of Population Health Sciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Owen J ArthursFaculty of Population Health Sciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1213-3516
John C HutchinsonDepartment of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1708-2634
Lyn S ChittyNorth East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Neil J SebireDepartment of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health 14/168/02Department of Health CDF-2017-10-037Department of Health HTA/14/168/02Department of Health ICA-CDRF-2017-03-053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerinatal and paediatric autopsy rates are at historically low levels with declining uptake due to dislike of the invasiveness of the procedure, and religious objections particularly amongst Muslim and Jewish parents. Less invasive methods of autopsy including imaging with and without tissue sampling have been shown to be feasible alternatives. We sought to investigate attitudes including religious permissibility and potential uptake amongst members of the Muslim and Jewish communities in the United Kingdom.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with religious and faith-based authorities (n = 16) and bereaved parents from the Jewish community (n = 3) as well as 10 focus groups with community members (60 Muslim participants and 16 Jewish participants) were conducted. Data were analysed using thematic analysis to identify key themes.

findingsMuslim and Jewish religious and faith-based authorities agreed that non-invasive autopsy with imaging was religiously permissible because it did not require incisions or interference with the body. A minimally invasive approach was less acceptable as it still required incisions to the body, although in those circumstances where it was required by law it was more acceptable than a full autopsy. During focus group discussions with community members, the majority of participants indicated they would potentially consent to a non-invasive autopsy if the body could be returned for burial within 24 hours, or if a family had experienced multiple fetal/pregnancy losses and the information gained might be useful in future pregnancies. Minimally invasive autopsy was less acceptable but around half of participants might consent if a non-invasive autopsy was not suitable, with the exception of the Jewish Haredi community who unanimously stated they would decline this alternative.

conclusionsOur research suggests less invasive autopsy offers a viable alternative to many Muslim and Jewish parents in the UK who currently decline a full autopsy. The findings may be of importance to other countries with significant Muslim and/or Jewish communities as well as to other religious communities where concerns around autopsy exist. Awareness-raising amongst religious leaders and community members will be important if these methods become routinely available.

Indexed as

AttitudeAutopsyCultureIslamJewsReligionAbortion, SpontaneousAdultBereavementChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedParents

Identifiers

PMID30092056
PMCPMC6085003
OpenAlexW2885067420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.