Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30092041›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Aedes albopictus production in urban stormwater catch basins and manhole chambers of downtown Shanghai, China.

Qiang Gao, Fei Wang, Xihong Lv, Hui Cao, Fei Su, Jianjun Zhou, Peien Leng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiang GaoDepartment of Vector Prevention, Shanghai Huangpu Center for Disease Control & Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3581-6662
Fei WangDepartment of Vector Prevention, Shanghai Hongkou Center for Disease Control & Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xihong LvDepartment of Vector Prevention, Shanghai Songjiang Center for Disease Control & Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hui CaoDepartment of Vector Prevention, Shanghai Huangpu Center for Disease Control & Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Fei SuDepartment of Vector Prevention, Shanghai Huangpu Center for Disease Control & Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jianjun ZhouDepartment of Vector Prevention, Shanghai Huangpu Center for Disease Control & Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Peien LengDepartment of Vector Prevention, Shanghai municipal Center for Disease Control & Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CNSongjiang District Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe near-surface urban drainage system in Shanghai is highly complex, with hundreds of thousands of catch basins (CBs) and manhole chambers (MCs). Comparatively little is known about the breeding of mosquitoes in this vast system, especially for the locally predominant species Aedes albopictus. A cross-sectional mosquito sampling study was conducted from late July to early August of 2017 using 539 CBs and 309 MCs located in 10 communities of downtown Shanghai. We measured the water-holding status of the drainage systems and density of mosquito larvae. Mosquito species were examined on site and in the laboratory later.

resultsThe CBs were characterized by a lower percentage of standing water compared to MCs (47.0% vs. 79.9%, respectively; X2 = 76.407, P<0.001), but CBs contained a higher percentage of stagnant water percent than MCs (45.2% vs. 35.3%, respectively; X2 = 11.465, P = 0.001). There were exclusively two species of mosquito larvae found in the drainage systems, Ae. albopictus and Culex pipiens complex. Compared with MCs, the structures of CBs were more conducive to larval production and yielded more larvae-positive samples (43.4% vs 14.2%, X2 = 53.136, P<0.001) and higher larval density (8.23 vs. 4.09 per dipper, t = 3.287, P = 0.001). Aedes albopictus was the predominant species in CBs, with a constituent ratio of 71.7%. Regarding structures with different features in different locations, CBs that had a vertical grate with an unsealed lid and MCs with plastic composite covers were the most favorable types for mosquito breeding, and residential neighborhoods yielded the highest number of Ae. albopictus.

conclusionAedes albopictus was the predominant species in both CBs and stormwater MCs, especially in residential neighborhoods. CBs, particularly those with vertical grates, were a major source of mosquito production in downtown Shanghai. MCs featured more running water and fewer larvae by percentage, and few larvae were found in Sewage MCs. However, due to the tremendous baseline amount, MCs were still an important breeding source of mosquitoes. We suggest that Aedes control in Shanghai should focus on CBs or other potential larvae habitats in and around residential neighborhoods. The use of permeable materials and completely sealed covers should be adopted in the construction of CBs and MCs henceforth.

Indexed as

Drainage, SanitaryMosquito ControlAedesAnimalsChinaCross-Sectional StudiesSewageSpecimen HandlingUrban RenewalWater PollutionSewage

Identifiers

PMID30092041
PMCPMC6084931
OpenAlexW2886931096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.