Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30091989›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Risk of retinal artery occlusion in patients with diabetes mellitus: A retrospective large-scale cohort study.

Yuh-Shin Chang, Chung-Han Ho, Chin-Chen Chu, Jhi-Joung Wang, Sung-Huei Tseng, Ren-Long Jan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Review of Current Management Practices.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuh-Shin ChangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chung-Han HoDepartment of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5925-8477
Chin-Chen ChuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Jhi-Joung WangDepartment of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Sung-Huei TsengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Ren-Long JanGraduate Institute of Medical Science, College of Health Science, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3205-7621
Chi Mei Medical Center · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a globally increasing prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM). Prolonged hyperglycaemia could lead to both macrovascular damage, such as carotid artery atherosclerosis, and microvascular damage, such as retinal arteriolar narrowing, and might contribute to retinal artery occlusion (RAO). Accordingly, it is important to determine whether DM is a contrubuting factor of RAO. We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included 241,196 DM patients from the Longitudinal Cohort of Diabetes Patients Database who were recruited between 2003 and 2005. An age- and sex-matched non-DM control group included the same number of patients who were selected from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database of 2000. Relevant data of each patient were collected from the index date until December 2013. The incidence and risk of RAO were calculated and compared between the DM and non-DM groups. The hazard ratio for RAO was calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis after adjusting for confounders. The cumulative incidence rate of RAO was calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. In total, 317 patients with DM and 144 controls developed RAO during the follow-up period, leading to an incidence rate of RAO in DM patients that was 2.30 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.89-2.80) greater than that in controls. After adjustment for potential confounders, patients with DM were 2.11 times (95% CI, 1.71-2.59) more likely to develop RAO in the total study cohort. In conclusion, DM increases the risk of RAO, which is an interdisciplinary emergency. Close collaboration between endocrinologists and ophthalmologists is important in managing RAO following DM.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRetinal Artery OcclusionRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTaiwanYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30091989
PMCPMC6084946
OpenAlexW2885481970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.