Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30091713›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2018

Sonographically indeterminate scrotal masses: how MRI helps in characterization.

Athina C Tsili, Michele Bertolotto, Laurence Rocher, Ahmet Tuncay Turgut, Vikram Dogra, Mustafa Seçil, Simon Freeman, Jane Belfield, Michal Studniarek, Alexandra Ntorkou and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. MRI in the evaluation of the azoospermic male.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Athina C TsiliDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, University Campus, Ioannina, Greece.
Michele BertolottoUco di Radiologia, Universita di Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Laurence RocherHôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud, APHP, site Bicêtre, Ecole doctorale Biosigne, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Ahmet Tuncay TurgutDepartment of Radiology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Vikram DograDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Mustafa SeçilDepartment of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Simon FreemanPlymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Jane BelfieldRoyal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Michal StudniarekMedical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Alexandra NtorkouDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, University Campus, Ioannina, Greece.
Lorenzo E DerchiUniversita di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Raymond OyenPrivate Practice, Leuven, Belgium.
Parvati RamchandaniPerelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Subramaniyan RamanathanConsultant Clinical Imaging, Hamad medical corporation, Doha-Qatar, Weill Cornell Medicine-New York (Qatar campus).
Jonathan RichenbergRoyal Sussex County Hospital Brighton and Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the scrotum represents a useful supplemental imaging technique in the characterization of scrotal masses, particularly recommended in cases of nondiagnostic ultrasonographic findings. An accurate characterization of the benign nature of scrotal masses, including both intratesticular and paratesticular ones may improve patient management and decrease the number of unnecessary radical surgical procedures. Alternative treatment strategies, including follow-up, lesion biopsy, tumor enucleation, or organ sparing surgery may be recommended. The aim of this pictorial review is to present how MRI helps in the characterization of sonographically indeterminate scrotal masses and to emphasize the key MRI features of benign scrotal masses.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReproducibility of ResultsScrotumTesticular DiseasesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID30091713
PMCPMC6045519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.