Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30091709›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2018

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for advanced esophageal cancer response assessment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Na-Na Sun, Chang Liu, Xiao-Lin Ge, Jie Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI andEuropean journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  7. State-of-the-art imaging in oesophago-gastric cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Early response assessment after CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for symptomatic vertebral hemangioma by quantitative parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Role of precision imaging in esophageal cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Imaging biomarkers for the treatment of esophageal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Na-Na SunDepartments of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Chang LiuDepartments of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiao-Lin GeDepartments of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jie WangDepartments of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to evaluate the treatment response of patients with esophageal cancer after concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).

methodsThis retrospective study included 59 patients with histologically confirmed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The patients underwent DCE-MRI before and 4 weeks after CRT. Patients with complete response were defined as the CR group; partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease patients were defined as the non-CR group. DCE-MRI parameters (Ktrans, Ve, and Kep) were measured and compared between pre- and post-CRT in the CR and non-CR groups, respectively. Pre-CRT and post-CRT parameters were used to calculate the absolute change and the ratio of change. DCE-MRI parameters were compared between the CR and non-CR groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to verify diagnostic performance.

resultsPatients with higher T-stage esophageal cancer might present with poorer response. After CRT, the Ktrans and Kep values significantly decreased in the CR group, whereas only Kep value decreased in the non-CR group. The post-Ktrans and post-Kep values were observed to be significantly lower in the CR group than in the non-CR group. The absolute change and ratio of change of both Ktrans and Kep were higher in the CR group than in the non-CR group. Based on ROC analysis, the ratio of change in Ktrans was the best parameter to assess treatment response (AUC= 0.840).

conclusionDCE-MRI parameters are valuable in predicting and assessing concurrent CRT response for advanced esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaAgedChemoradiotherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagusFemaleHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID30091709
PMCPMC6045514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.