Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30091207›Full record

ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2019

Sequential facial skin rejuvenation with intense pulsed light and non-ablative fractionated laser resurfacing in fitzpatrick skin type II-IV patients: A prospective multicenter analysis.

J Matthew Knight, Gerd Kautz

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intense Pulsed Light on skin rejuvenation: a systematic review.Archives of dermatological research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Assessment of Laser Effects on Skin Rejuvenation.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Matthew KnightKnight Dermatology Institute-Laser Center, Orlando, Florida.
Gerd KautzDermatological Practice-Laser Center, Konz, Germany.
Knight Dermatology Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile skin aging is triggered by multiple factors and typically presents with multiple manifestations, conventional treatment regimens deploy a single treatment modality. Typical approaches exploit ablative techniques, which involve considerable patient discomfort and downtime and can induce adverse events. Non-ablative fractionated laser (NAFL) resurfacing promotes neocollagenesis, with significantly fewer complications and discomfort. At the same time, intense pulsed light (IPL) therapies have a marked impact on skin tone, with an effect on collagen deposition. This study evaluated the combined effect of same-day, sequential IPL-NAFL treatment on photoaging of the face.

designIn this prospective study, 30 patients presenting Fitzpatrick skin types II-IV, elastosis scores 3-6 and mild to moderate pigmentation, underwent three sessions, of full-face IPL therapy, followed immediately by NAFL treatment, conducted at 4-6 weeks intervals. Wrinkle/elastosis and skin qualities were scored at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last treatment session. Immediate responses were evaluated up to 30 min following treatment and adverse events were monitored throughout the study period.

resultsWrinkle/elastosis scores gradually improved over the treatment period, with 59% of patients presenting a ≥1-point improvement in FES scores by the 1-month follow-up session, which persisted also at the 6 months follow-up visit. Good to excellent pigmentation responses were recorded for ≥63% and improvements in texture, brightness, and tightness were recorded for ≥80% of patients throughout the follow-up period. Over 90% of the treated patients exhibited improved or much improved overall appearance. Patient scorings and satisfaction level reflected physician assessments. Treatments were well tolerated and the social downtime observed was of 1.5 ± 0.25 days.

conclusionThe same-day combined IPL-NAFL regimen proved safe and elicited a significant skin rejuvenating effect, in a similar manner to that shown in other same-day combined therapies, without prolonging downtime of each individual modality. Lasers Surg. Med. 51:141-149, 2019. © 2018 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesFaceRejuvenationSkin AgingAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntense Pulsed Light TherapyLaser TherapyMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studiescosmteicfractionated laserintense pulsed lightIPLlasernon ablativepigmentationresurfacingskin rejuvenationwrinkles

Identifiers

PMID30091207
PMCPMC6585794
OpenAlexW2887835614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.