ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2019
Sequential facial skin rejuvenation with intense pulsed light and non-ablative fractionated laser resurfacing in fitzpatrick skin type II-IV patients: A prospective multicenter analysis.
Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intense Pulsed Light on skin rejuvenation: a systematic review.Archives of dermatological research · 2022Pooled it
- A Novel Treatment Schedule Combining Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Endolift Laser for Facial Rejuvenation: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Real-time vascular monitoring of PDLs and IPL for vascular treatment: effects of fluence and pulse duration on a rabbit ear model.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Energy-Based Skin Rejuvenation: A Review of Mechanisms and Thermal Effects.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
- Efficacy of Topical Hydroxypinacolone Retinoate-Peptide Product Versus Fractional COJournal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- A Clinical Safety Assessment of Hybrid Fractional Laser Use at Increased Depths for Facial Skin Rejuvenation in Patients Undergoing Rhytidectomy.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
- Advancements in laser technologies for skin rejuvenation: A comprehensive review of efficacy and safety.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2024Review
- Preauricular Aging: A Three-Point Grading System to Guide Treatment in Facial Rejuvenation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2021Article
- Assessment of Laser Effects on Skin Rejuvenation.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile skin aging is triggered by multiple factors and typically presents with multiple manifestations, conventional treatment regimens deploy a single treatment modality. Typical approaches exploit ablative techniques, which involve considerable patient discomfort and downtime and can induce adverse events. Non-ablative fractionated laser (NAFL) resurfacing promotes neocollagenesis, with significantly fewer complications and discomfort. At the same time, intense pulsed light (IPL) therapies have a marked impact on skin tone, with an effect on collagen deposition. This study evaluated the combined effect of same-day, sequential IPL-NAFL treatment on photoaging of the face.
designIn this prospective study, 30 patients presenting Fitzpatrick skin types II-IV, elastosis scores 3-6 and mild to moderate pigmentation, underwent three sessions, of full-face IPL therapy, followed immediately by NAFL treatment, conducted at 4-6 weeks intervals. Wrinkle/elastosis and skin qualities were scored at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last treatment session. Immediate responses were evaluated up to 30 min following treatment and adverse events were monitored throughout the study period.
resultsWrinkle/elastosis scores gradually improved over the treatment period, with 59% of patients presenting a ≥1-point improvement in FES scores by the 1-month follow-up session, which persisted also at the 6 months follow-up visit. Good to excellent pigmentation responses were recorded for ≥63% and improvements in texture, brightness, and tightness were recorded for ≥80% of patients throughout the follow-up period. Over 90% of the treated patients exhibited improved or much improved overall appearance. Patient scorings and satisfaction level reflected physician assessments. Treatments were well tolerated and the social downtime observed was of 1.5 ± 0.25 days.
conclusionThe same-day combined IPL-NAFL regimen proved safe and elicited a significant skin rejuvenating effect, in a similar manner to that shown in other same-day combined therapies, without prolonging downtime of each individual modality. Lasers Surg. Med. 51:141-149, 2019. © 2018 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.