Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30091001›Full record

Trial reportPsychonomic bulletin & review2019

Merely presenting one's own name along with target items is insufficient to produce a memory advantage for the items: A critical role of relational processing.

Kyungmi Kim, Jenne D Johnson, Danielle J Rothschild, Marcia K Johnson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyungmi KimDepartment of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, 06459-0408, USA. kkim01@wesleyan.edu.
Jenne D JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, 06459-0408, USA.
Danielle J RothschildDepartment of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, 06459-0408, USA.
Marcia K JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Effects of Aging on Memory for Source of InformationR37AG009253 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, MARCIA K. · 2004 to 2013
$5.7M
National Institutes of Health R37AG009253NIA NIH HHS R37 AG009253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using the self as a reference point at encoding produces a memory advantage over other types of encoding activities. Even simply co-presenting a target item with self-relevant versus other-relevant information can produce an "incidental" self-memory advantage in the absence of any explicit task demand to evaluate the item's self-relevancy. In the present study, we asked whether an incidental self-memory advantage results from (a) the mere co-presentation of a target item with self-relevant information at encoding or (b) relational processing between a target item and self-relevant information at encoding. During incidental encoding, words were presented in two different colors either above or below a name (the participant's own or another person's). Participants judged either the location of each word in relation to the name ("Is the word above or below the name?") or the color of each word to which the name had no relevance ("Is the word in red or green?"). In a subsequent memory test, we found a self-memory advantage for both items and their associated source features in the location judgment task but not in the color judgment task. Our findings show that a memory advantage for a target item presented with self-relevant versus other-relevant information is more likely when a task agenda places, via relational processing demands, the self-relevant/other-relevant information in the focus of attention along with the target item. Potential processes that mediate this attention-dependent effect are discussed.

Indexed as

AttentionMemorySelf ConceptSpatial ProcessingAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAttentionRelational encodingSelfSelf-reference effectSelf-related processing

Identifiers

PMID30091001
PMCPMC6368470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.