Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30090862›Full record

ArticleComputational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)2018

Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies.

Michael Moutoussis, Nitzan Shahar, Tobias U Hauser, Raymond J Dolan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How mood shapes belief updating bias in depression.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Belief Updating and Paranoia in Individuals With Schizophrenia.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2022
    Article
  17. Computational Methods in Psychotherapy: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Computational Psychiatry Needs Time and Context.Annual review of psychology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael MoutoussisWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4751-0425
Nitzan ShaharWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.
Tobias U HauserWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.
Raymond J DolanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning-based therapies, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, are used worldwide, and their efficacy is endorsed by health and research funding agencies. However, the mechanisms behind both their strengths and their weaknesses are inadequately understood. Here we describe how advances in computational modeling may help formalize and test hypotheses regarding how patients make inferences, which are core postulates of these therapies. Specifically, we highlight the relevance of computations with regard to the development, maintenance, and therapeutic change in psychiatric disorders. A Bayesian approach helps delineate which apparent inferential biases and aberrant beliefs are in fact near-normative, given patients' current concerns, and which are not. As examples, we formalize three hypotheses. First, high-level dysfunctional beliefs should be treated as beliefs over models of the world. There is a need to test how, and whether, people apply these high-level beliefs to guide the formation of lower level beliefs important for real-life decision making, conditional on their experiences. Second, during the genesis of a disorder, maladaptive beliefs grow because more benign alternative schemas are discounted during belief updating. Third, we propose that when patients learn within therapy but fail to benefit in real life, this can be accounted for by a mechanism that we term overaccommodation, similar to that used to explain fear reinstatement. Beyond these specifics, an ambitious collaborative research program between computational psychiatry researchers, therapists, and experts-by-experience needs to form testable predictions out of factors claimed to be important for therapy.

Indexed as

avoidanceBayesian inferencebelief updatingcognitive-behavioral therapycomputational psychiatryexposure-with-response-preventionmentalization-based therapynear-miss disasterreinforcement learningtherapy failure

Identifiers

PMID30090862
PMCPMC6067826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.