ArticleComputational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)2017
Can Peripheral Blood-Derived Gene Expressions Characterize Individuals at Ultra-high Risk for Psychosis?
Article in Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- MAGEB16 as an epigenetic timing regulator linking X-chromosome biology to neurodevelopmental vulnerability in Autism Spectrum Disorder.EXCLI journal · 2026Review
- Advancing atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometry applications: a multifaceted approach to optimising clinical data set generation.The Analyst · 2025Article
- Filter and Wrapper Stacking Ensemble (FWSE): a robust approach for reliable biomarker discovery in high-dimensional omics data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Constrained neuro fuzzy inference methodology for explainable personalised modelling with applications on gene expression data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Perspectives for better batch effect correction in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Extensions of the External Validation for Checking Learned Model Interpretability and Generalizability.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Review
- Avoid Oversimplifications in Machine Learning: Going beyond the Class-Prediction Accuracy.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Review
- A Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis Reveals lncRNA Abnormalities in the Peripheral Blood Associated With Ultra-High-Risk for Psychosis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Genetic liability in individuals at ultra-high risk of psychosis: A comparison study of 9 psychiatric traits.PloS one · 2020Article
- A cross-talk between blood-cell neuroplasticity-related genes and environmental enrichment in working dogs.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Can Peripheral Blood-Derived Gene Expressions Characterize Individuals at Ultra-high Risk for Psychosis?Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ultra-high risk (UHR) state was originally conceived to identify individuals at imminent risk of developing psychosis. Although recent studies have suggested that most individuals designated UHR do not, they constitute a distinctive group, exhibiting cognitive and functional impairments alongside multiple psychiatric morbidities. UHR characterization using molecular markers may improve understanding, provide novel insight into pathophysiology, and perhaps improve psychosis prediction reliability. Whole-blood gene expressions from 56 UHR subjects and 28 healthy controls are checked for existence of a consistent gene expression profile (signature) underlying UHR, across a variety of normalization and heterogeneity-removal techniques, including simple log-conversion, quantile normalization, gene fuzzy scoring (GFS), and surrogate variable analysis. During functional analysis, consistent and reproducible identification of important genes depends largely on how data are normalized. Normalization techniques that address sample heterogeneity are superior. The best performer, the unsupervised GFS, produced a strong and concise 12-gene signature, enriched for psychosis-associated genes. Importantly, when applied on random subsets of data, classifiers built with GFS are "meaningful" in the sense that the classifier models built using genes selected after other forms of normalization do not outperform random ones, but GFS-derived classifiers do. Data normalization can present highly disparate interpretations on biological data. Comparative analysis has shown that GFS is efficient at preserving signals while eliminating noise. Using this, we demonstrate confidently that the UHR designation is well correlated with a distinct blood-based gene signature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.