Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30090857›Full record

ArticleComputational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)2017

Can Peripheral Blood-Derived Gene Expressions Characterize Individuals at Ultra-high Risk for Psychosis?

Wilson Wen Bin Goh, Judy Chia-Ghee Sng, Jie Yin Yee, Yuen Mei See, Tih-Shih Lee, Limsoon Wong, Jimmy Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Perspectives for better batch effect correction in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wilson Wen Bin GohSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Judy Chia-Ghee SngDepartment of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jie Yin YeeResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Yuen Mei SeeResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Tih-Shih LeeNeuroscience and Behavioral Disorders Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
Limsoon WongDepartment of Computer Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jimmy LeeResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGInstitute of Mental Health · SGNational Neuroscience Institute · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ultra-high risk (UHR) state was originally conceived to identify individuals at imminent risk of developing psychosis. Although recent studies have suggested that most individuals designated UHR do not, they constitute a distinctive group, exhibiting cognitive and functional impairments alongside multiple psychiatric morbidities. UHR characterization using molecular markers may improve understanding, provide novel insight into pathophysiology, and perhaps improve psychosis prediction reliability. Whole-blood gene expressions from 56 UHR subjects and 28 healthy controls are checked for existence of a consistent gene expression profile (signature) underlying UHR, across a variety of normalization and heterogeneity-removal techniques, including simple log-conversion, quantile normalization, gene fuzzy scoring (GFS), and surrogate variable analysis. During functional analysis, consistent and reproducible identification of important genes depends largely on how data are normalized. Normalization techniques that address sample heterogeneity are superior. The best performer, the unsupervised GFS, produced a strong and concise 12-gene signature, enriched for psychosis-associated genes. Importantly, when applied on random subsets of data, classifiers built with GFS are "meaningful" in the sense that the classifier models built using genes selected after other forms of normalization do not outperform random ones, but GFS-derived classifiers do. Data normalization can present highly disparate interpretations on biological data. Comparative analysis has shown that GFS is efficient at preserving signals while eliminating noise. Using this, we demonstrate confidently that the UHR designation is well correlated with a distinct blood-based gene signature.

Indexed as

feature selectiongene expressionpsychosisultra-high risk

Identifiers

PMID30090857
PMCPMC6067827
OpenAlexW2765391421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.