ArticleSmall methods2018
3D-Printing of Functional Biomedical Microdevices via Light- and Extrusion-Based Approaches.
Article in Small methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advances in Concentration Gradient Generation Approaches in a Microfluidic Device for Toxicity Analysis.Cells · 2022Pooled it
- Bionic microneedles: Design inspired by bionics and its applications in medicine.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Progressive Insights into 3D Bioprinting for Corneal Tissue Restoration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Integrating Bioprinting and Increased Throughput: Next-Generation Models for Cardiac Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Precision: Unveiling the Potential of 3D Printing in Drug Delivery, Tissue Engineering, and Regenerative Medicine.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2025Article
- Strategies for the vascular patterning of engineered tissues for organ repair.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Thermal Post-Processing of 3D-Printed Poly(glycerol dodecanedioate) Controls Mechanics and Shape Memory Properties.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- A Novel Triad of Bio-Inspired Design, Digital Fabrication, and Bio-Derived Materials for Personalised Bone Repair.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Light-Assisted 3D-Printed Hydrogels for Antibacterial Applications.Small science · 2024Article
- Direct laser writing-enabled 3D printing strategies for microfluidic applications.Lab on a chip · 2024Review
- Recent Developments in Bio-Ink Formulations Using Marine-Derived Biomaterials for Three-Dimensional (3D) Bioprinting.Marine drugs · 2024Review
- Micropatterning of functional lipid bilayer assays for quantitative bioanalysis.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Article
- 3D-Printed Microinjection Needle Arrays via a Hybrid DLP-Direct Laser Writing Strategy.Advanced materials technologies · 2023Article
- High cell density and high-resolution 3D bioprinting for fabricating vascularized tissues.Science advances · 2023Article
- Ink Material Selection and Optical Design Considerations in DLP 3D Printing.Applied materials today · 2023Article
- Review
- To infinity and beyond: Strategies for fabricating medicines in outer space.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2022Article
- Soft nano and microstructures for the photomodulation of cellular signaling and behavior.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- Current Concepts and Methods in Tissue Interface Scaffold Fabrication.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Design Aspects of Additive Manufacturing at Microscale: A Review.Micromachines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D-printing is a powerful additive manufacturing tool, one that enables fabrication of biomedical devices and systems that would otherwise be challenging to create with more traditional methods such as machining or molding. Many different classes of 3D-printing technologies exist, most notably extrusion-based and light-based 3D-printers, which are popular in consumer markets, with advantages and limitations for each modality. The focus here is primarily on showcasing the ability of these 3D-printing platforms to create different types of functional biomedical microdevices-their advantages and limitations are covered with respect to other classes of 3D-printing, as well as the past, recent, and future efforts to advance the functional microdevice domain. In particular, the fabrication of micromachines/robotics, drug-delivery devices, biosensors, and microfluidics is addressed. The current challenges associated with 3D-printing of functional microdevices are also addressed, as well as future directions to improve both the printing techniques and the performance of the printed products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.