ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2018
Patient perspectives of the experience of a computerized cognitive assessment in a clinical setting.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating digital cognitive tests for clinical use in Alzheimer's disease: A novel framework and scoping review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Observational
- Subjective daytime sleepiness, not sleep quality or hypoxia, predicts sleep-dependent memory consolidation in a cohort of older adults.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Article
- Perspectives on Technology Use in the Context of Caregiving for Persons With Dementia: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Article
- Inclusion of a computerized test in ADHD diagnosis process can improve trust in the specialists' decision and elevate adherence levels.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- The Return of Biomarker Results in Research: Balancing Complexity, Precision, and Ethical Responsibility.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Review
- Validation of a web-based self-administered test for cognitive assessment in a Swedish geriatric setting.PloS one · 2024Article
- Technology in Dementia Education: An Ethical Imperative in a Digitized World.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- Advancing user-centric design and technology adoption for aging populations: a multifaceted approach.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- The necessary, albeit belated, transition to computerized cognitive assessment.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Usability of the Virtual Supermarket Test for Older Adults with and without Cognitive Impairment.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2022Article
- Assessing the Attitudes of Greek Nurses Toward Computerized Dementia Screening.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2020Article
- A Novel Perspective Linkage Between Kidney Function and Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018Article
- Article
- Validity and reliability of a digital solution for cognitive assessment: The Brain on Track®.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionComputerized assessments are becoming widely accepted in the clinical setting and as a potential outcome measure in clinical trials. To gain patient perspectives of this experience, the aim of the present study was to investigate patient attitudes and perceptions of the Cognigram [Cogstate], a computerized cognitive assessment.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 older adults undergoing a computerized cognitive assessment at the University of British Columbia Hospital Clinic for Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders. Thematic analysis was applied to identify key themes and relationships within the data.
resultsThe analysis resulted in three categories: attitudes toward computers in healthcare, the cognitive assessment process, and evaluation of the computerized assessment experience. The results show shared views on the need for balance between human and computer intervention, as well as room for improvement in test design and utility. DISCUSSION: Careful design and user-testing should be made a priority in the development of computerized assessment interfaces, as well as reevaluating the cognitive assessment process to minimize patient anxiety and discomfort. Future research should move toward continuous data capture within clinical trials and ensuring instruments of high reliability to reduce variance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.