ArticleMethodsX2018
Combining genotypic and phenotypic analyses on single mutant zebrafish larvae.
Article in MethodsX, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pain management in zebrafish : Report from a FELASA Working Group.Laboratory animals · 2024Review
- Poly (A)-specific ribonuclease deficiency impacts oogenesis in zebrafish.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- SCN1A overexpression, associated with a genomic region marked by a risk variant for a common epilepsy, raises seizure susceptibility.Acta neuropathologica · 2022Article
- Total Nucleic Acid Extraction from Single Zebrafish Embryos for Genotyping and RNA-seq.Bio-protocol · 2022Article
- Article
- Suppressing STAT3 activity protects the endothelial barrier from VEGF-mediated vascular permeability.Disease models & mechanisms · 2021Article
- Article
- TheGenes · 2020Article
- Iroquois Homeobox 1 Acts as a True Tumor Suppressor in Multiple Organs by Regulating Cell Cycle Progression.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Ezh1 arises from Ezh2 gene duplication but its function is not required for zebrafish development.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zebrafish is a powerful animal model used to study vertebrate embryogenesis, organ development and diseases (Gut et al., 2017) [1]. The usefulness of the model was established as a result of various large forward genetic screens identifying mutants in almost every organ or cell type (Driever et al., 1996; Haffter et al., 1996) [[2], [3]]. More recently, the advent of genome editing methodologies, including TALENs (Sander et al., 2011) [4] and the CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Hwang et al., 2013) [5], led to an increase in the production of zebrafish mutants. A number of these mutations are homozygous lethal at the embryonic or larval stages preventing the generation of homozygous mutant zebrafish lines. Here, we present a method allowing both genotyping and phenotype analyses of mutant zebrafish larvae from heterozygous zebrafish incrosses. The procedure is based on the genotyping of the larval tail after transection, whereas phenotypic studies are performed on the anterior part of the zebrafish larvae. •The method includes (i) a protocol for genotyping, (ii) protocols for paraffin embedding and histological analyses, (iii) protocols for protein and histone extraction and characterization by Western blot, (iv) protocols for RNA extraction and characterization by RT-PCR, and (v) protocols to study caudal spinal cord regeneration.•The technique is optimized in order to be applied on single zebrafish embryos and larvae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.