ReviewEnvironmental epigenetics2018
Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance and social responsibility: perspectives from the social sciences.
Review in Environmental epigenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Black community member perceptions and ethics recommendations on epigenomic research.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Breastfeeding in Italy. How "the first 1,000 days" discourse molecularises social expectations of intensive mothering.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Unaltered hepatic wound healing response in male rats with ancestral liver injury.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Maternal epigenetic responsibility: what can we learn from the pandemic?Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2022Article
- Genomics and justice: mitigating the potential harms and inequities that arise from the implementation of genomics in medicine.Human genetics · 2022Article
- Exploring the Ethics of Implementation of Epigenomics Technologies in Cancer Screening: A Focus Group Study.Epigenetics insights · 2021Article
- "It's Never Too Early": Preconception Care and Postgenomic Models of Life.Frontiers in sociology · 2020Article
- Communicating science: epigenetics in the spotlight.Environmental epigenetics · 2020Review
- Epigenetics Underlying Susceptibility and Resilience Relating to Daily Life Stress, Work Stress, and Socioeconomic Status.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Review
- CpG and Non-CpG Methylation in the Diet-Epigenetics-Neurodegeneration Connection.Current nutrition reports · 2019Review
- Herbert Spencer, Sociological Theory, and the Professions.Frontiers in sociology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research in environmental epigenetics explores how environmental exposures and life experiences such as food, toxins, stress or trauma can shape trajectories of human health and well-being in complex ways. This perspective resonates with social science expertise on the significant health impacts of unequal living conditions and the profound influence of social life on bodies in general. Environmental epigenetics could thus provide an important opportunity for moving beyond long-standing debates about nature versus nurture between the disciplines and think instead in 'biosocial' terms across the disciplines. Yet, beyond enthusiasm for such novel interdisciplinary opportunities, it is crucial to also reflect on the scientific, social and political challenges that a biosocial model of body, health and illness might entail. In this paper, we contribute historical and social science perspectives on the political opportunities and challenges afforded by a biosocial conception of the body. We will specifically focus on what it means if biosocial plasticity is not only perceived to characterize the life of individuals but also as possibly giving rise to semi-stable traits that can be passed on to future generations. That is, we will consider the historical, social and political valences of the scientific proposition of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. The key question that animates this article is if and how the notion of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance creates new forms of responsibilities both in science and in society. We propose that, ultimately, interdisciplinary conversation and collaboration is essential for responsible approaches to transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in science and society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.