Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30090637›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical

Onset of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is not influenced by current relapsing multiple sclerosis therapies.

Francisco Coret, Francisco C Pérez-Miralles, Francisco Gascón, Carmen Alcalá, Arantxa Navarré, Ana Bernad, Isabel Boscá, Matilde Escutia, Sara Gil-Perotin, Bonaventura Casanova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unmet needs and gaps in the identification of secondary progression in multiple sclerosis: a Southern Italy healthcare professionals' perspective.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Deciphering Multiple Sclerosis Progression.Frontiers in neurology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco CoretNeuroimmunology Unit, Hospital Clínic de València, Spain.
Francisco C Pérez-MirallesNeuroimmunology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Spain.
Francisco GascónNeuroimmunology Unit, Hospital Clínic de València, Spain.
Carmen AlcaláNeuroimmunology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Spain.
Arantxa NavarréNeuroimmunology Unit, Hospital Clínic de València, Spain.
Ana BernadNeuroimmunology Unit, Hospital Clínic de València, Spain.
Isabel BoscáNeuroimmunology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Spain.
Matilde EscutiaNeuroimmunology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Spain.
Sara Gil-PerotinNeuroimmunology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3793-0116
Bonaventura CasanovaNeuroimmunology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3806-925X
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisease-modifying therapies are thought to reduce the conversion rate to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

objectiveTo explore the rate, chronology, and contributing factors of conversion to the progressive phase in treated relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.

methodsOur study included 204 patients treated for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis between 1995 and 2002, prospectively followed to date. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to estimate the time until secondary progressive multiple sclerosis conversion, and multivariate survival analysis with a Cox regression model was used to analyse prognostic factors.

resultsRelapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients were continuously treated for 13 years (SD 4.5); 36.3% converted to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis at a mean age of 42.6 years (SD 10.6), a mean time of 8.2 years (SD 5.2) and an estimated mean time of 17.2 years (range 17.1-18.1). A multifocal relapse, age older than 34 years at disease onset and treatment failure independently predicted conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis but did not influence the time to reach an Expanded Disability Status Scale of 6.0.

conclusionsThe favourable influence of disease-modifying therapies on long-term disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is well established. However, the time to progression onset and the subsequent clinical course in treated patients seem similar to those previously reported in natural history studies. More studies are needed to clarify the effect of disease-modifying therapies once the progressive phase has been reached.

Indexed as

disease-modifying therapiesinterferonsMultiple sclerosisnatural historyrelapsing–remitting multiple sclerosissecondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID30090637
PMCPMC6077906
OpenAlexW2810644983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.