Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30090026›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology

Pre-irradiation dental care: Ready-to-use templates for oropharyngeal cancers.

Raphaël Jumeau, Phuc Félix Nguyen-Tan, Houda Bahig, Xavier Liem, Louise Lambert, Matthieu Schmittbuhl, Dany Simard, Edith Filion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Multi-omics in exploring the pathophysiology of diabetic retinopathy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Raphaël JumeauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Phuc Félix Nguyen-TanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Houda BahigDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Xavier LiemDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Louise LambertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Matthieu SchmittbuhlFaculty of Dentistry, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Dany SimardDepartment of Radiation Physics, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Edith FilionDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop a tool in order to guide pre-irradiation dental care (PIDC) for patients with oropharyngeal cancers.

backgroundOsteoradionecrosis of the jaws is a potential complication of radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancers. To prevent this complication, PIDC can involve multiple dental extractions as a preventative measure to avoid post-RT complications. However, there is no standardized tool to guide PIDC. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom January 2005 to October 2015, 120 head and neck cancer patients were prospectively included in a study investigating dysgeusia after RT. From this cohort, patients were enrolled according to the following inclusion criteria: histopathological confirmation of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; stage T1-4 N1-3 M0; ≤10 missing teeth. Individual teeth were retrospectively delineated on planning computed tomography and doses to dentition were assessed to generate templates.

resultsThirty-three patients were included. Molars received highest doses with a mean dose of 50 Gy (range; 19-75 Gy). Ipsi-lateral and contralateral wisdom teeth received RT dose superior to 50 Gy in 92% and 56% of cases, respectively. Patients with advanced disease (T4 or N2c-3) received higher mean doses on inferior and ipsi-lateral dental arches compared to other patients (T1-3 N0-2b): 42 Gy

conclusionPre-RT dose distribution templates are an objective way to prepare PIDC. Further studies with a larger cohort are needed to validate these templates.

Indexed as

Oral healthOropharyngeal cancersOsteoradionecrosisRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30090026
PMCPMC6078107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.