Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089943›Full record

ArticleJournal of cytology

Correlative Study of Cytological Features in Grading of Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

Anamika Sinha, Satyajit S Gill

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anamika SinhaDepartment of Pathology, Base Hospital and ACMS, New Delhi, India.
Satyajit S GillDepartment of Laboratory Services, Jehangir Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Jehangir Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextFine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a proven diagnostic technique for establishing the benign or malignant character of breast lesions. Several cytological grading systems have been proposed for grading of carcinoma breast, with results similar to histologic grades.

aimsThis study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of FNAC in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast by correlating it with histological grade. SETTINGS AND

designTertiary care hospital, retrospective analytical study. PATIENTS AND

methodsOne hundred and fifty cases of breast carcinoma that underwent modified radical mastectomy consequent to an FNAC diagnosis were included in the study. Robinson's grading system and Elston-Ellis modification of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grading system were used to assign cytologic and histologic grades, respectively. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The cytological grades were correlated with the histological grades using χ

resultsA statistically significant association was observed between cytologic and histologic grades (

conclusionsRobinson's cytologic grading system is a reliable grading method on FNAC smears of cases of carcinoma breast. It correlates well with Elston-Ellis modification of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast.

Indexed as

Elston–Ellis modification of Scarff–Bloom–Richardson grading systemfine-needle aspiration cytologyinvasive duct carcinomaRobinson's grading system

Identifiers

PMID30089943
PMCPMC6060574
OpenAlexW2803323132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.