Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089856›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2018

The effect of mesenchymal stem cells' secretome on lung cancer progression is contingent on their origin: primary or metastatic niche.

Oshrat Attar-Schneider, Liat Drucker, Maya Gottfried

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The vascular nature of lung-resident mesenchymal stem cells.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oshrat Attar-SchneiderLung Cancer Research, Lung Cancer Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, 44281, Israel. oshrat.attar@clalit.org.il.
Liat DruckerOncogenetic Laboratories, Lung Cancer Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, 44281, Israel.
Maya GottfriedLung Cancer Research, Lung Cancer Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, 44281, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · ILMeir Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fatality of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the role of the cancer microenvironment in its resistance to therapy are long recognized. Accumulating data allocate a significant role for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the malignant environment. Previously, we have demonstrated that MSCs from NSCLC metastatic bone marrow (BM) niche deleteriously affected NSCLC cells. Here, we have decided to examine the effect of MSCs from the primary niche of the lung (healthy or adjacent to tumor) on NSCLC phenotype. We cultured NSCLC cell lines with healthy/NSCLC lung-MSCs conditioned media (secretome) and showed elevation in cells' MAPKs and translation initiation signals, proliferation, viability, death, and migration. We also established enhanced autophagy and epithelial to mesenchymal transition processes. Moreover, we observed that MSCs from tumor adjacent sites (pathological niche) exhibited a more profound effect than MSCs from healthy lung tissue. Our findings underscore the capacity of the lung-MSCs to modulate NSCLC phenotype. Interestingly, both tumor adjacent (pathological) and distant lung-MSCs (healthy) promoted the NSCLC's TI, proliferation, migration, and epithelial to mesenchymal transition, yet the pathological MSCs displayed a greater affect. In conclusion, by comparing the effects of normal lung-MSCs, NSCLC adjacent MSCs, and BM-MSCs, we have established that the primary and metastatic niches display opposite and critical effects that promote the cancerous systemic state. Specifically, the primary site MSCs promote the expansion of the malignant clone and its dispersion, whereas the metastatic site MSCs facilitates the cells re-seeding. We suggest that sabotaging the cross-talk between MSCs and NSCLC affords effective means to inhibit lung cancer progression and will require different targeting strategies in accordance with niche/disease stage.

Indexed as

A549 CellsAgedAutophagyCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell MovementCell ProliferationCell SurvivalEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4EEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4GFemaleHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMAP Kinase Signaling SystemEIF4G1 protein, humanEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4EEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4G

Identifiers

PMID30089856
OpenAlexW2886211145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.