Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089850›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2018

Characterizing well-differentiated culture of primary human nasal epithelial cells for use in wound healing assays.

Johanna Schagen, Peter D Sly, Emmanuelle Fantino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. In vitro 3D culture lung model from expanded primary cystic fibrosis human airway cells.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2020
    Article
  12. Strong correlation between air-liquid interface cultures and in vivo transcriptomics of nasal brush biopsy.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johanna SchagenChildren's Lung, Environment and Asthma Research Team, Centre for Children's Health Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Peter D SlyChildren's Lung, Environment and Asthma Research Team, Centre for Children's Health Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. p.sly@uq.edu.au.
Emmanuelle FantinoChildren's Lung, Environment and Asthma Research Team, Centre for Children's Health Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nasal epithelium is the initial contact between the external environment and the respiratory tract and how it responds to noxious stimuli and repairs epithelial damage is important. Growing airway epithelial cells in culture at air-liquid interface allows for a physiologically relevant model of the human upper airways. The aim of the present study was to characterize human primary nasal epithelial cells grown at the air-liquid interface and establish a model for use in wound healing assays. This study determined the time required for full differentiation of nasal epithelial cells in an air-liquid interface culture to be at least 7 weeks using the standardized B-ALI media. Also, a model was established that studied the response to wounding and the effect of EGFR inhibition on this process. Nasal epithelial cultures from healthy subjects were differentiated at air-liquid interface and manually wounded. Wounds were monitored over time to complete closure using a time lapse imaging microscope with cultures identified to have a rate of wound healing above 2.5%/h independent of initial wound size. EGFR inhibition caused the rate of wound healing to drop a significant 4.6%/h with there being no closure of the wound after 48 h. The robust model established in this study will be essential for studying factors influencing wound healing, including host disease status and environmental exposures in the future.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationWound HealingCytokinesErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleHumansMaleNasal MucosaPrimary Cell CultureCytokinesEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsErlotinib Hydrochloride

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.