Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089691›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2018

Adjuvant-Dependent Enhancement of HIV Env-Specific Antibody Responses in Infant Rhesus Macaques.

Bonnie Phillips, Koen K A Van Rompay, Jennifer Rodriguez-Nieves, Clarisse Lorin, Marguerite Koutsoukos, Mark Tomai, Christopher B Fox, Josh Eudailey, Maria Dennis, S Munir Alam and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Precision adjuvants for pediatric vaccines.Science translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Nonhuman primate models of pediatric viral diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Targeting natural killer cells to enhance vaccine responses.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Bonnie PhillipsDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Koen K A Van RompayCalifornia National Primate Research Center, University of California at Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7375-1337
Jennifer Rodriguez-NievesDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Clarisse LorinGlaxoSmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium.
Marguerite KoutsoukosGlaxoSmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium.
Mark Tomai3M Drug Delivery Systems, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Christopher B FoxIDRI, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Josh EudaileyDuke University Medical Center, Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Maria DennisDuke University Medical Center, Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
S Munir AlamDuke University Medical Center, Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Michael HudgensCenter for AIDS Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Genevieve FoudaDuke University Medical Center, Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Justin PollaraDuke University Medical Center, Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Anthony MoodyDuke University Medical Center, Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Xiaoying ShenDuke University Medical Center, Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Guido FerrariDuke University Medical Center, Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sallie PermarDuke University Medical Center, Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kristina De ParisDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA abelk@med.unc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5199-3004
Duke Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USGlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEInfectious Disease Research Institute · USKindeva Drug Delivery (United States) · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
National Institute on Aging (NIA) ColonyP51OD011107 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Simon J. Atkinson · 2012 to 2026
$191.5M
Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGIA Doris TOMARAS · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Project 2: RNA vaccination in early life to induce potent and broad HIV Env-specific antibody responsesP01AI117915 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI DE PARIS, KRISTINA, PERMAR, SALLIE R. · 2015 to 2024
$21.2M
Combined Hepatitis B and HIV-1 envelope vaccination to augment T cell help via linked recognition of unrelated antigensK01OD024877 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POLLARA, JUSTIN JOSEPH · 2017 to 2019
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI117915NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518NIH HHS K01 OD024877NIH HHS P51 OD011107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toward the goal of developing an effective HIV vaccine that can be administered in infancy to protect against postnatal and lifelong sexual HIV transmission risks, the current pilot study was designed to compare the effect of novel adjuvants on the induction of HIV Env-specific antibody responses in infant macaques. Aligning our studies with the adjuvanted proteins evaluated in a prime-boost schedule with ALVAC in the ongoing HVTN (HIV Vaccine Trials Network) 702 efficacy trial, we selected the bivalent clade C Env immunogens gp120 C.1086 and gp120 TV1 in combination with the MF59 adjuvant. However, we hypothesized that the adjuvant system AS01, that is included in the pediatric RTS,S malaria vaccine, would promote Env-specific antibody responses superior to those of the oil-in-water MF59 emulsion adjuvant. In a second study arm, we compared two emulsions, glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant formulated in a stable emulsion (GLA-SE) and 3M-052-SE, containing Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and TLR7/TLR8 (TLR7/8) ligand, respectively. The latter adjuvant had been previously demonstrated to be especially effective in activating neonatal antigen-presenting cells. Our results demonstrate that different adjuvants drive quantitatively or qualitatively distinct responses to the bivalent Env vaccine. AS01 induced higher Env-specific plasma IgG antibody levels than the antigen in MF59 and promoted improved antibody function in infants, and 3M-052-SE outperformed GLA-SE by inducing the highest breadth and functionality of antibody responses. Thus, distinct adjuvants are likely to be required for maximizing vaccine-elicited immune responses in infants, particularly when immunization in infancy aims to elicit both perinatal and lifelong immunity against challenging pathogens such as HIV.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationAdjuvants, ImmunologicAIDS VaccinesAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAntigen-Presenting CellsHIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120Immunoglobulin GMacaca mulattaAdjuvants, ImmunologicAIDS VaccinesHIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120Immunoglobulin Gadjuvantantibody responseHIVpediatric vaccine

Identifiers

PMID30089691
PMCPMC6158427
OpenAlexW2886049060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.