Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089658›Full record

ArticleOpen biology2018

Conserved temporal ordering of promoter activation implicates common mechanisms governing the immediate early response across cell types and stimuli.

Annalaura Vacca, Masayoshi Itoh, Hideya Kawaji, Erik Arner, Timo Lassmann, Carsten O Daub, Piero Carninci, Alistair R R Forrest, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, FANTOM Consortium and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Annalaura VaccaMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
Masayoshi ItohRIKEN Preventive Medicine and Diagnosis Innovation Program, 2F Main Research Building, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Japan.
Hideya KawajiRIKEN Advanced Center for Computing and Communication, RIKEN Yokohama Campus, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan.
Erik ArnerRIKEN Center for Life Sciences Technologies, RIKEN Yokohama Campus, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan.
Timo LassmannTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Roberts Road, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Carsten O DaubDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Piero CarninciRIKEN Center for Life Sciences Technologies, RIKEN Yokohama Campus, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan.
Alistair R R ForrestHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, 6 Verdun Street, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Yoshihide HayashizakiRIKEN Preventive Medicine and Diagnosis Innovation Program, 2F Main Research Building, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Japan.
FANTOM Consortium
Stuart AitkenMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4867-4568
Colin A SempleMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK colin.semple@igmm.ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1765-4118
Institute of Genetics and Cancer · GBRIKEN · JPHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research · AUKarolinska Institutet · SERIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00007/16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promoters of immediate early genes (IEGs) are rapidly activated in response to an external stimulus. These genes, also known as primary response genes, have been identified in a range of cell types, under diverse extracellular signals and using varying experimental protocols. Whereas genomic dissection on a case-by-case basis has not resulted in a comprehensive catalogue of IEGs, a rigorous meta-analysis of eight genome-wide FANTOM5 CAGE (cap analysis of gene expression) time course datasets reveals successive waves of promoter activation in IEGs, recapitulating known relationships between cell types and stimuli: we obtain a set of 57 (42 protein-coding) candidate IEGs possessing promoters that consistently drive a rapid but transient increase in expression over time. These genes show significant enrichment for known IEGs reported previously, pathways associated with the immediate early response, and include a number of non-coding RNAs with roles in proliferation and differentiation. Surprisingly, we also find strong conservation of the ordering of activation for these genes, such that 77 pairwise promoter activation orderings are conserved. Using the leverage of comprehensive CAGE time series data across cell types, we also document the extensive alternative promoter usage by such genes, which is likely to have been a barrier to their discovery until now. The common activation ordering of the core set of early-responding genes we identify may indicate conserved underlying regulatory mechanisms. By contrast, the considerably larger number of transiently activated genes that are specific to each cell type and stimulus illustrates the breadth of the primary response.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionGenes, Immediate-EarlyPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscriptional ActivationCell DifferentiationCell LineCell ProliferationGenome, HumanHumansImmediate-Early ProteinsMCF-7 CellsRNA, UntranslatedImmediate-Early ProteinsRNA, UntranslatedCAGE dataimmediate early responsepromoter activitytime series analysis

Identifiers

PMID30089658
PMCPMC6119861
OpenAlexW2886000961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.