Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089644›Full record

ArticlemSphere2018

Evaluation of a Validated Luminex-Based Multiplex Immunoassay for Measuring Immunoglobulin G Antibodies in Serum to Pneumococcal Capsular Polysaccharides.

Charles Y Tan, Fred W Immermann, Shite Sebastian, Michael W Pride, Danka Pavliakova, Kelly A Belanger, Wendy Watson, Daniel A Scott, Mohinder Sidhu, Kathrin U Jansen and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Toxic Effects and Mechanisms of Nano-Cu on the Spleen of Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Charles Y TanPfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fred W ImmermannPfizer Inc., Pearl River, New York, USA.
Shite SebastianAffinivax, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael W PridePfizer Inc., Pearl River, New York, USA.
Danka PavliakovaPfizer Inc., Pearl River, New York, USA.
Kelly A BelangerPfizer Inc., Pearl River, New York, USA.
Wendy WatsonPfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daniel A ScottPfizer Inc., Pearl River, New York, USA.
Mohinder SidhuPfizer Inc., Pearl River, New York, USA.
Kathrin U JansenPfizer Inc., Pearl River, New York, USA.
Peter C GiardinaPfizer Inc., Pearl River, New York, USA peter.giardina@pfizer.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article describes the results of a study designed to bridge the World Health Organization (WHO) pneumococcal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) platform to the validated Luminex-based 13-plex direct immunoassay (dLIA) platform developed by Pfizer, Inc. Both assay platforms quantify serotype-specific serum IgG antibodies (in micrograms per milliliter) against an international reference standard serum. The primary goal of this study was to determine if the dLIA is a suitable replacement for the ELISA to support clinical vaccine studies that include the evaluation of immune responses to serotypes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, and 23F. Serum samples were selected from four pivotal 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (13vPnC; Prevnar 13) clinical trials on the basis of their serotype-specific IgG concentrations by ELISA. In these studies, subjects were immunized either with 13vPnC or with 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (7vPnC; Prevnar). There were 1,528 of 1,574 selected samples with sufficient remaining volume for reanalysis in the dLIA. A comparison of assay results from the dLIA and ELISA platforms showed clear and robust linear quantitative relationships across all 13 serotypes. In addition, lower IgG antibody concentrations in preimmunization samples were measured in the dLIA, thus allowing better differentiation between preimmunization and low-titer postimmunization samples. Overall, the results showed that the established population-level protective threshold IgG concentration, 0.35 µg/ml of serotype-specific serum IgG antibodies, is appropriate for use for data generated using the dLIA platform developed by Pfizer, Inc., for 10 serotypes: serotypes 1, 3, 4, 6A, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F. On the basis of the extensive bridging analyses, however, the use of dLIA cutoff values of 0.23, 0.10, and 0.12 µg/ml is recommended for serotypes 5, 6B, and 19A, respectively. This adjustment will ensure that the consistency of the established population-level protective threshold IgG concentration is maintained when switching from the ELISA to the dLIA platform. The results of this bridging study demonstrate that the 13-plex dLIA platform is a suitable replacement for the WHO reference ELISA platform.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialClinical Trials as TopicHeptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate VaccineHumansImmunoassayImmunoglobulin GPneumococcal VaccinesPolysaccharides, BacterialSerumStreptococcus pneumoniae13-valent pneumococcal vaccineAntibodies, BacterialHeptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate VaccineImmunoglobulin GPneumococcal VaccinesPolysaccharides, BacterialELISAimmunoassayLuminexpneumoniaStreptococcusvaccine

Identifiers

PMID30089644
PMCPMC6083092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.