Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089501›Full record

ReviewJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2018

Multi-ingredient pre-workout supplements, safety implications, and performance outcomes: a brief review.

Patrick S Harty, Hannah A Zabriskie, Jacob L Erickson, Paul E Molling, Chad M Kerksick, Andrew R Jagim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Effects of Theacrine as a Pre-Workout Supplement.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrick S HartySchool of Health Sciences, Department of Exercise Science, Lindenwood University, St. Charles, MO, 63301, USA.
Hannah A ZabriskieSchool of Health Sciences, Department of Exercise Science, Lindenwood University, St. Charles, MO, 63301, USA.
Jacob L EricksonMayo Clinic Health Systems, Onalaska, WI, 54650, USA.
Paul E MollingMayo Clinic Health Systems, Onalaska, WI, 54650, USA.
Chad M KerksickSchool of Health Sciences, Department of Exercise Science, Lindenwood University, St. Charles, MO, 63301, USA.
Andrew R JagimSchool of Health Sciences, Department of Exercise Science, Lindenwood University, St. Charles, MO, 63301, USA. ajagim@lindenwood.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6651-5096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, a new class of dietary supplements called multi-ingredient pre-workout supplements (MIPS) has increased in popularity. These supplements are intended to be taken prior to exercise and typically contain a blend of ingredients such as caffeine, creatine, beta-alanine, amino acids, and nitric oxide agents, the combination of which may elicit a synergistic effect on acute exercise performance and subsequent training adaptations compared to single ingredients alone. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to review the theoretical rationale and available scientific evidence assessing the potential ergogenic value of acute and chronic ingestion of MIPS, to address potential safety concerns surrounding MIPS supplementation, and to highlight potential areas for future research. Though direct comparisons between formulations of MIPS or between a MIPS and a single ingredient are challenging and often impossible due to the widespread use of "proprietary blends" that do not disclose specific amounts of ingredients in a given formulation, a substantial body of evidence suggests that the acute pre-exercise consumption of MIPS may positively influence muscular endurance and subjective mood, though mixed results have been reported regarding the acute effect of MIPS on force and power production. The chronic consumption of MIPS in conjunction with a periodized resistance training program appears to augment beneficial changes in body composition through increased lean mass accretion. However, the impact of long-term MIPS supplementation on force production, muscular endurance, aerobic performance, and subjective measures is less clear. MIPS ingestion appears to be relatively safe, though most studies that have assessed the safety of MIPS are relatively short (less than eight weeks) and thus more information is needed regarding the safety of long-term supplementation. As with any dietary supplement, the use of MIPS carries implications for the athlete, as many formulations may intentionally contain banned substances as ingredients or unintentionally as contaminants. We suggest that athletes thoroughly investigate the ingredients present in a given MIPS prior to consumption. In conclusion, it appears that multi-ingredient pre-workout supplements have promise as an ergogenic aid for active individuals, though further information is required regarding long-term efficacy and safety in a wider variety of populations.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceDietary SupplementsAmino AcidsAthletesbeta-AlanineBetaineCaffeineCreatineHumansMuscle StrengthPerformance-Enhancing SubstancesPhysical EnduranceSports Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAmino Acidsbeta-AlanineBetaineCaffeineCreatinePerformance-Enhancing SubstancesEnergyErgogenic aidPowerPre-workoutResistance-trainingStrengthSupplement

Identifiers

PMID30089501
PMCPMC6083567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.