Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089497›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Assessment of select electronic health information systems that support immunization data capture - Kenya, 2017.

Apophia Namageyo-Funa, Millicent Aketch, Collins Tabu, Adam MacNeil, Peter Bloland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Apophia Namageyo-FunaGlobal Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, H24-2, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA. aen5@cdc.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-6758-021X
Millicent AketchAfrican Field Epidemiology Network, Lugogo House, Ground Floor (Wings B&C), Plot 42, Lugogo By-Pass, P.O. Box 12874, Kampala, Uganda.
Collins TabuNational Vaccines and Immunization Program, Ministry of Health, P.O Box 43319-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Adam MacNeilGlobal Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, H24-2, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Peter BlolandGlobal Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, H24-2, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough electronic health information systems (EHIS) with immunization components exist in Kenya, questions and concerns remain about their use and alignment with the Kenya Ministry of Health's (MOH) National Vaccine and Immunization Program (NVIP). This article reports on the findings of an assessment of select EHIS with immunization components in Kenya, specifically related to system design, development, and implementation.

methodsWe conducted a rapid assessment of select EHIS with immunization components in Kenya from January to May 2017 to understand the design, development, implementation of the EHIS including the lessons learned from their use. We also assessed how the data elements in the EHIS compared to the data elements in the Maternal and Child Health Booklet used in the existing paper based system in Kenya.

resultsThe EHIS reviewed varied in purpose, content, and population covered. Only one system was built to focus specifically on immunization data. Substantial differences in system functionality and immunization-related data elements included in the EHIS were identified. None of the EHIS had all the data elements necessary to fully replace or operate independently from the standardized paper-based system for recording immunization data in Kenya.

conclusionsOverall, the findings of this assessment highlighted substantial variation in the EHIS with immunization components. The findings provide insights and lessons learned for the Kenya MOH NVIP, immunization partners, vendors of EHIS, and users of EHIS to consider as Kenya transitions from paper-based to electronic immunization information systems.

Indexed as

Health Information SystemsChildChild Health ServicesData CollectionFemaleHumansKenyaMaternal Health ServicesVaccinationVaccinesVaccinesAssessmentDataElectronic health information systemImmunizationKenyaRegistryStandards

Identifiers

PMID30089497
PMCPMC6083510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.