Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089478›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Second primary cancer after primary peritoneal, epithelial ovarian, and fallopian tubal cancer: a retrospective study.

Myong Cheol Lim, Young-Joo Won, Jiwon Lim, Tahereh Salehi, Chong Woo Yoo, Robert E Bristow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Surgical outcomes of second primary lung cancer after the extrapulmonary malignancy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Myong Cheol LimDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Irvine Medical Center, University of California, California, USA.
Young-Joo WonDepartment of Cancer Control & Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea. astra67@ncc.re.kr.
Jiwon LimCancer Registration and Statistics Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Tahereh SalehiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Irvine Medical Center, University of California, California, USA.
Chong Woo YooCenter for Uterine Cancer and Center for Clinical Trials, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Robert E BristowDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Irvine Medical Center, University of California, California, USA.
National Cancer Center · KRUniversity of California, Irvine Medical Center · US

Funding

National Cancer Center NCC-1610200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this retrospective study, data from patients listed in the Korea Central Cancer Registry during 1993-2014 were analysed, to investigate the incidence and survival of second primary cancers (SPCs) after a diagnosis of primary peritoneal, epithelial ovarian, and fallopian tubal (POFT) cancer.

methodsThe standardised incidence ratio (SIR) and survival outcomes of patients with SPCs among POFT cancer survivors were analysed.

resultsAmong 20,738 POFT cancer survivors, 798 (3.84%) developed SPCs, at an average interval of 5.50 years. SPC risk in POFT survivors (SIR, 1.29) was higher compared to the general population. The most high-risk type of SPC was leukaemia (3.07) followed by the lung and bronchus (1.80), colon (1.58), rectum and rectosigmoid junction (1.42), thyroid (1.34), and breast (1.26). In women aged < 60 years, cancer of the breast (1.30), ascending colon (2.26), and transverse colon (4.07) as SPCs increased. Up to 10 years after POFT cancer treatment, leukaemia risk increased, especially in those < 60 years, with serous histology, and with distant stage, which required aggressive chemotherapy. The median overall survival time was 12.8 years and 14.3 years in women with POFT cancer and SPCs, respectively. Thyroid and breast cancers were favourable prognostic markers among SPCs.

conclusionsThe overall SPC risk increases in POFT cancer survivors, especially in those < 60 years. The cancer risk of breast and the proximal colon increase based on hereditary predisposition, while leukaemia likely develops from aggressive treatment. The median overall survival is favourable in POFT cancer survivors with SPCs.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFallopian Tube NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryPeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesFallopian tubal cancerOvarian cancerPrimary peritoneal cancerSecond primary

Identifiers

PMID30089478
PMCPMC6083613
OpenAlexW2886399847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.