Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089455›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

PRS-on-Spark (PRSoS): a novel, efficient and flexible approach for generating polygenic risk scores.

Lawrence M Chen, Nelson Yao, Elika Garg, Yuecai Zhu, Thao T T Nguyen, Irina Pokhvisneva, Shantala A Hari Dass, Eva Unternaehrer, Hélène Gaudreau, Marie Forest and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The association between temperament and polygenic score for psychopathology from infancy to middle childhood.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lawrence M ChenDouglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, H4H1R3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nelson YaoDouglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, H4H1R3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Elika GargDouglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, H4H1R3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Yuecai ZhuDouglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, H4H1R3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Thao T T NguyenDouglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, H4H1R3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Irina PokhvisnevaDouglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, H4H1R3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Shantala A Hari DassDouglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, H4H1R3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Eva UnternaehrerDouglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, H4H1R3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Hélène GaudreauDouglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, H4H1R3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marie ForestLudmer Centre for Neuroinformatics and Mental Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lisa M McEwenCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Julia L MacIsaacCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Michael S KoborCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Celia M T GreenwoodLudmer Centre for Neuroinformatics and Mental Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Patricia P SilveiraDouglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, H4H1R3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Michael J MeaneyDouglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, H4H1R3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Kieran J O'DonnellDouglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, H4H1R3, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. kieran.odonnell@mcgill.ca.
Douglas Mental Health University Institute · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAJewish General Hospital · CACanadian Institute for Advanced Research · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolygenic risk scores (PRS) describe the genomic contribution to complex phenotypes and consistently account for a larger proportion of variance in outcome than single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) alone. However, there is little consensus on the optimal data input for generating PRS, and existing approaches largely preclude the use of imputed posterior probabilities and strand-ambiguous SNPs i.e., A/T or C/G polymorphisms. Our ability to predict complex traits that arise from the additive effects of a large number of SNPs would likely benefit from a more inclusive approach.

resultsWe developed PRS-on-Spark (PRSoS), a software implemented in Apache Spark and Python that accommodates different data inputs and strand-ambiguous SNPs to calculate PRS. We compared performance between PRSoS and an existing software (PRSice v1.25) for generating PRS for major depressive disorder using a community cohort (N = 264). We found PRSoS to perform faster than PRSice v1.25 when PRS were generated for a large number of SNPs (~ 17 million SNPs; t = 42.865, p = 5.43E-04). We also show that the use of imputed posterior probabilities and the inclusion of strand-ambiguous SNPs increase the proportion of variance explained by a PRS for major depressive disorder (from 4.3% to 4.8%).

conclusionsPRSoS provides the user with the ability to generate PRS using an inclusive and efficient approach that considers a larger number of SNPs than conventional approaches. We show that a PRS for major depressive disorder that includes strand-ambiguous SNPs, calculated using PRSoS, accounts for the largest proportion of variance in symptoms of depression in a community cohort, demonstrating the utility of this approach. The availability of this software will help users develop more informative PRS for a variety of complex phenotypes.

Indexed as

SoftwareAdultAllelesCohort StudiesGenomicsGenotypeHumansMajor Depressive DisorderModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritancePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsBioinformaticsGenetic profile score, Multi-core processingMajor depressive disorderPolygenic risk scorePRS-on-sparkPRSoS

Identifiers

PMID30089455
PMCPMC6083617
OpenAlexW2952683761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.