Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089306›Full record

ArticleNeuro-degenerative diseases2018

Estimating the Evolution of Disease in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative.

Samuel Iddi, Dan Li, Paul S Aisen, Michael S Rafii, Irene Litvan, Wesley K Thompson, Michael C Donohue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-degenerative diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prognostic Modeling of Parkinson's Disease Progression Using Early Longitudinal Patterns of Change.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel IddiAlzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, California, USA.
Dan LiAlzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, California, USA.
Paul S AisenAlzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, California, USA.
Michael S RafiiAlzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, California, USA.
Irene LitvanDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Wesley K ThompsonDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Michael C DonohueAlzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, California, USA.

Funding

Estimating Long-Term Disease Trajectories from Short-Term DataR01AG049750 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DONOHUE, MICHAEL C · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease is the second most common neurological disease and affects about 1% of persons over the age of 60 years. Due to the lack of approved surrogate markers, confirmation of the disease still requires postmortem examination. Identifying and validating biomarkers are essential steps toward improving clinical diagnosis and accelerating the search for therapeutic drugs to ameliorate disease symptoms. Until recently, statistical analysis of multicohort longitudinal studies of neurodegenerative diseases has usually been restricted to a single analysis per outcome with simple comparisons between diagnostic groups. However, an important methodological consideration is to allow the modeling framework to handle multiple outcomes simultaneously and consider the transitions between diagnostic groups. This enables researchers to monitor multiple trajectories, correctly account for the correlation among biomarkers, and assess how these associations may jointly change over the long-term course of disease. In this study, we apply a latent time joint mixed-effects model to study biomarker progression and disease dynamics in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) and examine which markers might be most informative in the earliest phases of disease. The results reveal that, even though diagnostic category was not included in the model, it seems to accurately reflect the temporal ordering of the disease state consistent with diagnosis categorization at baseline. In addition, results indicated that the specific binding ratio on striatum and the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) show high discriminability between disease stages. An extended latent time joint mixed-effects model with heterogeneous latent time variance also showed improvement in model fit in a simulation study and when applied to real data.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutopsyBiomarkersCorpus StriatumFemaleGray MatterHumansMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseParkinsonian DisordersBiomarkersBiomarkersClinical diagnosisDisease trajectoriesJoint mixed-effects modelsLatent time shiftMulticohort longitudinal dataMultilevel Bayesian modelsParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID30089306
PMCPMC6314496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.