Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089279›Full record

Observational studyCaries research2019

Pediatric Adapted Liking Survey: A Novel, Feasible and Reliable Dietary Screening in Clinical Practice.

Sharon R Smith, Stephanie T Johnson, Samantha M Oldman, Valerie B Duffy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Caries research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07195474 (Effect of Daily Yogurt Smoothies on Neurocognitive Function in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07195474 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Daily Yogurt Smoothies on Neurocognitive Function in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorPenn State UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsExecutive Functions (EF), Microbiome, Dietary QualityArmsYogurt Smoothie (1 per day), Yogurt Smoothie (2 per day), Fruit Juice Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of a Nutrition Questionnaire for Dental Caries Risk Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sharon R SmithUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, CT Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Stephanie T JohnsonDepartment of Research, CT Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Samantha M OldmanDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Valerie B DuffyDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USAvalerie.duffy@uconn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRapid yet useful methods are needed to screen for dietary behaviors in clinical settings. We tested the feasibility and reliability of a pediatric adapted liking survey (PALS) to screen for dietary behaviors and suggest tailored caries and obesity prevention messages.

methodsIn an observational study, children admitted to a pediatric emergency department (PED) for nonurgent care were approached to complete the PALS (33 foods, 4 nonfoods including brushing teeth). Measured height/weight were used for body mass index (BMI) percentile determination. Feasibility was assessed by response rate and PALS completion time. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency of food groups and test-retest reliability for PED-home reported PALS.

resultsPALS was completed by 144 children (96% of approached) - 54% male (average age = 11 ± 3 years) with diversity in family income (43% publicly insured), race/ethnicity (15% African American, 33% Hispanic, 44% Caucasian) and adiposity (3% underweight, 50% normal, 31% overweight, 17% obese, 8% extremely obese). The average completion time was 3: 52 min, and conceptual food groups had reasonable internal reliability. From 57% (n = 82) with PED-home completion, PALS had a good/excellent test-retest reliability. Relative preferences for sweets versus brushing teeth identified unique groups of children for tailored prevention messages (high sweet/brushing preference, sweets > brushing, brushing > sweets). Females with higher adiposity reported significantly greater preference for sweet/high-fat foods, independently of demographic variables; the relationship was nonsignificant in males and with the other food groups.

conclusionThe PALS appears to be a fast, feasible and reliable dietary screener in a clinical setting to assist in forming tailored diet-related messages for dental caries and obesity prevention.

Indexed as

Dental CariesDietHealth BehaviorHealth SurveysObesityAdolescentBody Mass IndexChildFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningReproducibility of ResultsCariesCaries preventionChildrenDietary assessmentDietary screenerObesity preventionSweet preferenceTest-retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID30089279
PMCPMC6425815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.