Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089231›Full record

ArticleZebrafish2018

Delay of Initial Feeding of Zebrafish Larvae Until 8 Days Postfertilization Has No Impact on Survival or Growth Through the Juvenile Stage.

Rafael E Hernandez, Louie Galitan, James Cameron, Nicola Goodwin, Lalita Ramakrishnan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zebrafish, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Critical period plasticity enables credit assignment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Dynamic expression of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) proteome across early larval development.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part D, Genomics & proteomics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Apollo-NADPScience advances · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafael E Hernandez1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Louie Galitan2 Center for Global Infectious Diseases Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute , Seattle, Washington.
James Cameron3 Department of Microbiology, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Nicola Goodwin4 Molecular Immunity Unit, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, United Kingdom .
Lalita Ramakrishnan3 Department of Microbiology, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Center for Infectious Disease Research · USMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

ACADEMIC PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASET32HD007233 · NICHD · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI KEVIN B URDAHL · 1985 to 2026
$6.7M
Host-Responses to Mycobacterium Infection in ZebrafishR37AI054503 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAMAKRISHNAN, LALITA · 2012 to 2021
$3.1M
The role of mycobacterial efflux pumps in virulence and antibiotic toleranceK08AI116908 · NIAID · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI HERNANDEZ, RAFAEL E · 2015 to 2019
$873k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI116908NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI054503NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007233Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of early-stage zebrafish for biomedical research spans early organogenesis to free-swimming larva. A key benefit of this model organism is that repeated assessments spanning several days can be performed of individual larvae within a single experiment, often in conjunction with administered drugs. However, the initiation of feeding, typically at 5 days postfertilization (dpf), can make serial assessments challenging. Therefore, delayed feeding would increase the utility of the model. To ask whether feeding could be delayed without adversely affecting larval growth and development up to 39 dpf, we systematically raised zebrafish and introduced feeding at 5 dpf or delayed initial feeding up to 9 dpf. We assessed survival into the juvenile stage (39 dpf) and anterior-posterior length at this age as proxies for growth and development. Delaying feeding initiation up to 8 dpf did not decrease baseline survival of greater than 90%; survival decreased to 66% only when delayed to 9 dpf. Larval length was no different under any of these conditions. Our findings define 9 dpf as the critical age before which larval zebrafish must be fed when raising to 39 dpf. The option to delay feeding to 8 dpf will broaden experimental applications for the zebrafish larval model.

Indexed as

Food DeprivationAnimalsFeeding BehaviorFertilizationLarvaSurvival RateZebrafishanimal regulationfeedinggrowthsurvival

Identifiers

PMID30089231
PMCPMC6198760
OpenAlexW2886409498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.