Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089230›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of pathology2019

Polyglutamine Repeats in Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Andrew P Lieberman, Vikram G Shakkottai, Roger L Albin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 183 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
183citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

183 citing papers in PubMed, 296 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. GFP-free live neuron quantitative imaging reveals compartmentalization and growth dynamics of polyQ aggregates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  14. Novel proteomics and neuropathology ofFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Exploring huntington's disease from a neurodevelopmental perspective.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew P LiebermanDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA; email: liebermn@umich.edu.
Vikram G ShakkottaiDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA; email: vikramsh@umich.edu , ralbin@umich.edu.
Roger L AlbinDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA; email: vikramsh@umich.edu , ralbin@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · US

Funding

Public Outreach and Education CoreP50NS091856 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALBIN, ROGER L · 2014 to 2019
$10.1M
Mechanisms of motor neuron toxicity in Kennedy DiseaseR01NS055746 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LIEBERMAN, ANDREW P, OSAWA, YOICHI · 2007 to 2021
$6.0M
Identifying symptomatic and neuroprotective strategies for cerebellar ataxiaR01NS085054 · NINDS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHAKKOTTAI, VIKRAM GOVINDARAJU · 2013 to 2023
$4.3M
Small molecule stabilizers of Hsp70 for treatment of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophyR33NS101030 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LIEBERMAN, ANDREW P, OSAWA, YOICHI · 2019 to 2020
$770k
Cholinergic Interneurons in Tourette SyndromeR21NS088302 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALBIN, ROGER L · 2014 to 2015
$427k
Small molecule stabilizers of Hsp70 for treatment of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophyR21NS101030 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LIEBERMAN, ANDREW P, OSAWA, YOICHI · 2018 to 2018
$389k
NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS091856NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055746NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085054NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS088302NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS101030NINDS NIH HHS R33 NS101030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the age-dependent protein aggregation disorders, nine neurodegenerative diseases are caused by expansions of CAG repeats encoding polyglutamine (polyQ) tracts. We review the clinical, pathological, and biological features of these inherited disorders. We discuss insights into pathogenesis gleaned from studies of model systems and patients, highlighting work that informs efforts to develop effective therapies. An important conclusion from these analyses is that expanded CAG/polyQ domains are the primary drivers of neurodegeneration, with the biology of carrier proteins influencing disease-specific manifestations. Additionally, it has become apparent that CAG/polyQ repeat expansions produce neurodegeneration via multiple downstream mechanisms, involving both gain- and loss-of-function effects. This conclusion indicates that the likelihood of developing effective therapies targeting single nodes is reduced. The evaluation of treatments for premanifest disease will likely require new investigational approaches. We highlight the opportunities and challenges underlying ongoing work and provide recommendations related to the development of symptomatic and disease-modifying therapies and biomarkers that could inform future research.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesPeptidesTrinucleotide RepeatsBiomarkersPeptidespolyglutamineHuntington's diseaseneurodegenerationpolyglutaminespinal and bulbar muscular atrophyspinocerebellar ataxiatrinucleotide repeat disorders

Identifiers

PMID30089230
PMCPMC6387631
OpenAlexW2887748872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.