Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089116›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

When mathematics meets physical activity in the school-aged child: The effect of an integrated motor and cognitive approach to learning geometry.

Mladen Hraste, Andrea De Giorgio, Petra Mandić Jelaska, Johnny Padulo, Ivan Granić

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of school-based physical activity on mathematics performance in children: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Relationship between Learning and Psychomotor Skills in Early Childhood Education.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Analysis of Motor Intervention Program on the Development of Gross Motor Skills in Preschoolers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mladen HrasteUniversity of Split, Faculty of Science, Independent Department of Social and Human sciences, Split, Croatia.
Andrea De GiorgioeCampus University, Faculty of Psychology, Novedrate (CO), Italy.
Petra Mandić JelaskaUniversity of Split, Faculty of Kinesiology, Split, Croatia.
Johnny PaduloeCampus University, Faculty of Psychology, Novedrate (CO), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4254-3105
Ivan GranićUniversity of Split, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Department of General Courses, Split, Croatia.
University of Split · HRUniversità degli Studi eCampus · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematics is a science which can lead to both anxiety in children and teaching difficulties in teachers. Together, these two difficulties can increase the time spent in teaching and learning mathematics. The aim of this study is to examine the efficiency of a new integrated mathematics/geometry and physical activity program, specifically structured for increasing learning in fourth-grade pupils. Thirty-six children (age 10.36±0.55) were divided into an experimental (n1 = 19) group and a control (n2 = 17) group. The experimental group of subjects learned mathematics and geometry via the integrated teaching method, while the control group of subjects learned these subjects via traditional teaching methods. We administered two ad hoc tests, before and after the intervention, in order to study its effect. One test was on geometry knowledge and the other on mathematics, in which there were questions about the implemented teaching topics: rectangles, squares and their perimeters. Using a factorial 2×2 ANOVA, the results after four weeks indicated that the group of subjects who gained their mathematics and geometry knowledge through our intervention program were significantly more successful (P<0.05) than the control group. Our results suggest that the integrated teaching method proposed here could be considered a useful and efficient method for teaching mathematics and geometry based on motor tasks.

Indexed as

AchievementExerciseTeachingChildCognitionEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansLearningMaleMathematics

Identifiers

PMID30089116
PMCPMC6082508
OpenAlexW2887826759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.