Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30089115›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Intricate tunnels in garnets from soils and river sediments in Thailand - Possible endolithic microborings.

Magnus Ivarsson, Henrik Skogby, Bongkot Phichaikamjornwut, Stefan Bengtson, Sandra Siljeström, Prayote Ounchanum, Apichet Boonsoong, Mingkhwan Kruachanta, Federica Marone, Veneta Belivanova and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Magnus IvarssonUniversity of Southern Denmark, Department of Biology and Nordic Center for Earth Evolution, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4548-1560
Henrik SkogbySwedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Geosciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bongkot PhichaikamjornwutGems and Jewelry Program, Faculty of Science, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Stefan BengtsonSwedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Palaeobiology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sandra SiljeströmRISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioscience and Materials/Chemistry and Materials, Stockholm, Sweden.
Prayote OunchanumDepartment of Geological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Apichet BoonsoongDepartment of Geological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Mingkhwan KruachantaDepartment of Geological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Federica MaroneSwiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Veneta BelivanovaSwedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Palaeobiology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sara HolmströmStockholm University, Department of Geological Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Chiang Mai University · THSwedish Museum of Natural History · SEPaul Scherrer Institute · CHRISE Research Institutes of Sweden · SESrinakharinwirot University · THStockholm University · SEUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Garnets from disparate geographical environments and origins such as oxidized soils and river sediments in Thailand host intricate systems of microsized tunnels that significantly decrease the quality and value of the garnets as gems. The origin of such tunneling has previously been attributed to abiotic processes. Here we present physical and chemical remains of endolithic microorganisms within the tunnels and discuss a probable biological origin of the tunnels. Extensive investigations with synchrotron-radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy (SRXTM) reveal morphological indications of biogenicity that further support a euendolithic interpretation. We suggest that the production of the tunnels was initiated by a combination of abiotic and biological processes, and that at later stages biological processes came to dominate. In environments such as river sediments and oxidized soils garnets are among the few remaining sources of bio-available Fe2+, thus it is likely that microbially mediated boring of the garnets has trophic reasons. Whatever the reason for garnet boring, the tunnel system represents a new endolithic habitat in a hard silicate mineral otherwise known to be resistant to abrasion and chemical attack.

Indexed as

Ferrous CompoundsFossilsGeologic SedimentsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMineralsRiversSilicatesSoilSpectrometry, X-Ray EmissionThailandFerrous CompoundsMineralsSilicatesSoil

Identifiers

PMID30089115
PMCPMC6082506
OpenAlexW2886614182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.